qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 07/25] intel_iommu: define several structs fo


From: Peter Xu
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 07/25] intel_iommu: define several structs for IOMMU IR
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 13:45:09 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 11:21:35AM +0300, David Kiarie wrote:
[...]
> >> +
> >> +/* Programming format for MSI/MSI-X addresses */
> >> +union VTD_IR_MSIAddress {
> >> +    struct {
> >> +        uint8_t __not_care:2;
> >> +        uint8_t index_h:1;          /* Interrupt index bit 15 */
> >> +        uint8_t sub_valid:1;        /* SHV: Sub-Handle Valid bit */
> >> +        uint8_t int_mode:1;         /* Interrupt format */
> >> +        uint16_t index_l:15;        /* Interrupt index bit 14-0 */
> >> +        uint16_t __head:12;         /* Should always be: 0x0fee */
> >> +    } QEMU_PACKED;
> >> +    uint32_t data;
> >> +};
> >
> > In a recent discussion, it was brought to my attention that you might
> > have a problem with bitfields when the host cpu is not x86. Have you
> > considered this ?
> 
> In a case when say the host cpu is little endian.

I assume you mean when host cpu is big endian. x86 was little endian,
and I was testing on x86.

I think you are right. I should do conditional byte swap for all
uint{16/32/64} cases within the fields. For example, index_l field in
above VTD_IR_MSIAddress. And there are several other cases that need
special treatment in the patchset. Will go over and fix corresponding
issues in next version.

Thanks!

-- peterx



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]