On 05/31/2016 04:07 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
The command will work this way:
qemu-img create --trace qcow2* -f qcow2 1.img 64G
Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <address@hidden>
Suggested by: Daniel P. Berrange <address@hidden>
CC: Eric Blake <address@hidden>
CC: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
CC: Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden>
CC: Kevin Wolf <address@hidden>
---
qemu-img.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 96 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Missing man page additions.
@@ -155,7 +157,12 @@ static void QEMU_NORETURN help(void)
"Parameters to compare subcommand:\n"
" '-f' first image format\n"
" '-F' second image format\n"
- " '-s' run in Strict mode - fail on different image size or sector
allocation\n";
+ " '-s' run in Strict mode - fail on different image size or sector
allocation\n"
+ "\n"
+ "General purpose options:\n"
+ " -R, --trace [[enable=]<pattern>][,events=<file>][,file=<file>]\n"
+ " specify tracing options\n"
+ " see qemu(1) man page for full description\n";
Why -R? Because -T is already in use by rebase and compare? I'd almost
rather have _just_ --trace with no short option, than to pick yet
another letter, but you might want to wait for other opinions first.
I'd list general parameters before sub-command parameters. I'd also
update the synopsis:
qemu-img [general options] command [command options]