[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 PATCH 01/13] Introduce TCGOpcode for memory bar
From: |
Sergey Fedorov |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 PATCH 01/13] Introduce TCGOpcode for memory barrier |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Jun 2016 18:49:39 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 |
On 06/06/16 18:47, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Sergey Fedorov <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On 03/06/16 21:27, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Richard Henderson <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> What if we have tcg_canonicalize_memop (or some such) split off the
>>>> barriers
>>>> into separate opcodes. E.g.
>>>>
>>>> MO_BAR_LD_B = 32 // prevent earlier loads from crossing current op
>>>> MO_BAR_ST_B = 64 // prevent earlier stores from crossing current op
>>>> MO_BAR_LD_A = 128 // prevent later loads from crossing current op
>>>> MO_BAR_ST_A = 256 // prevent later stores from crossing current op
>>>> MO_BAR_LDST_B = MO_BAR_LD_B | MO_BAR_ST_B
>>>> MO_BAR_LDST_A = MO_BAR_LD_A | MO_BAR_ST_A
>>>> MO_BAR_MASK = MO_BAR_LDST_B | MO_BAR_LDST_A
>>>>
>>>> // Match Sparc MEMBAR as the most flexible host.
>>>> TCG_BAR_LD_LD = 1 // #LoadLoad barrier
>>>> TCG_BAR_ST_LD = 2 // #StoreLoad barrier
>>>> TCG_BAR_LD_ST = 4 // #LoadStore barrier
>>>> TCG_BAR_ST_ST = 8 // #StoreStore barrier
>>>> TCG_BAR_SYNC = 64 // SEQ_CST barrier
>>> I really like this format. I would also like to add to the frontend:
>>>
>> Actually, the acquire barrier is a combined load-load + load-store
>> barrier; and the release barrier is a combo of load-store + store-store
>> barriers.
>>
> All the above are two-way barriers. Acquire/Release are one-way
> barriers. So we cannot combine the above to get acquire/release
> semantics without being conservative.
Do you mean *barriers* or *memory access* operations implying memory
ordering?
Regards,
Sergey
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 PATCH 01/13] Introduce TCGOpcode for memory barrier, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 PATCH 01/13] Introduce TCGOpcode for memory barrier, Sergey Fedorov, 2016/06/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 PATCH 01/13] Introduce TCGOpcode for memory barrier, Pranith Kumar, 2016/06/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 PATCH 01/13] Introduce TCGOpcode for memory barrier, Sergey Fedorov, 2016/06/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 PATCH 01/13] Introduce TCGOpcode for memory barrier, Peter Maydell, 2016/06/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 PATCH 01/13] Introduce TCGOpcode for memory barrier, Sergey Fedorov, 2016/06/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 PATCH 01/13] Introduce TCGOpcode for memory barrier, Alex Bennée, 2016/06/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 PATCH 01/13] Introduce TCGOpcode for memory barrier, Pranith Kumar, 2016/06/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 PATCH 01/13] Introduce TCGOpcode for memory barrier, Sergey Fedorov, 2016/06/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 PATCH 01/13] Introduce TCGOpcode for memory barrier, Sergey Fedorov, 2016/06/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 PATCH 01/13] Introduce TCGOpcode for memory barrier, Pranith Kumar, 2016/06/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 PATCH 01/13] Introduce TCGOpcode for memory barrier,
Sergey Fedorov <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 PATCH 01/13] Introduce TCGOpcode for memory barrier, Pranith Kumar, 2016/06/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 PATCH 01/13] Introduce TCGOpcode for memory barrier, Sergey Fedorov, 2016/06/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 PATCH 01/13] Introduce TCGOpcode for memory barrier, Pranith Kumar, 2016/06/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 PATCH 01/13] Introduce TCGOpcode for memory barrier, Richard Henderson, 2016/06/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 PATCH 01/13] Introduce TCGOpcode for memory barrier, Pranith Kumar, 2016/06/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 PATCH 01/13] Introduce TCGOpcode for memory barrier, Sergey Fedorov, 2016/06/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 PATCH 01/13] Introduce TCGOpcode for memory barrier, Peter Maydell, 2016/06/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 PATCH 01/13] Introduce TCGOpcode for memory barrier, Sergey Fedorov, 2016/06/06