qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 00/28] Add qapi-to-JSON and clone visitors


From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 00/28] Add qapi-to-JSON and clone visitors
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 10:16:52 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0

On 06/03/2016 06:09 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Most patches are ready as is or with minor touch-ups.
> 
> I'd probably drop PATCH 01.  The file name collision no longer exists,
> and moving files just to improve their names a bit doesn't seem worth
> the bother.

It's a bit more churn to the rest of the series, but I can live with it.
It's also more related to the JSON visitor than the clone visitor, so
even if I do want to keep it, it makes more sense to keep it with the
second half of the series.

> 
> There are memory leaks in PATCH 12 and 24 (see review of PATCH 24).
> 
> PATCH 13 needs more work than I'm comfortable to do on commit.  Mostly
> missing comment updates, but also a crash bug.

I've got that fix ready to post.

> 
> On PATCH 21, I have minor interface design doubts.
> 
> The only difficult question is what to do about invalid UTF-8 strings
> and non-finite numbers.  Patches before PATCH 29 show opinions, but a
> decision isn't made until PATCH 29.  Good, because it leaves most of
> this series not blocked by the debate on what we should do.
> 
> I guess I could take PATCH 02-12 now, and let you respin the rest.  But
> perhaps its easier if you respin all of them.

I'm posting v5 of 2-15 now, then focusing on your comments on the JSON
visitor for a later posting.

I also think my subset F series (adding a 'box' parameter) is relatively
orthogonal, if you want to start reviewing that:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-05/msg03569.html

I'd still LOVE to get blockdev-add working for ALL block devices before
2.7 soft freeze (there's patches for NBD that I need to review, and I
know the gluster folks were waiting on qapi patches to be able to use a
SocketAddress union as the basis for the gluster branch of the
blockdev-add union - and my qapi patches are almost all the way there to
permitting it).

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]