[Qemu-devel] [PULL 04/10] target-i386: Remove xlevel & hv-spinlocks option fixups

[Eduardo Habkost]

The "fixup will be removed in future versions" warnings are
present since QEMU 1.7.0, at least, so users should have fixed
their scripts and configurations, already.

In the case of libvirt users, libvirt doesn't use the "xlevel"
option, and already rejects HyperV spinlock retry count < 0xFFF.

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden>
---
 target-i386/cpu.c | 36 +-----------------------------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.c b/target-i386/cpu.c
index f3f95cd..a62d731 100644
--- a/target-i386/cpu.c
+++ b/target-i386/cpu.c
@@ -1952,7 +1952,6 @@ static void x86_cpu_parse_featurestr(CPUState *cs, char 
*features,
     FeatureWordArray plus_features = { 0 };
     /* Features to be removed */
     FeatureWordArray minus_features = { 0 };
-    uint32_t numvalue;
     CPUX86State *env = &cpu->env;
     Error *local_err = NULL;
 
@@ -1967,23 +1966,7 @@ static void x86_cpu_parse_featurestr(CPUState *cs, char 
*features,
         } else if ((val = strchr(featurestr, '='))) {
             *val = 0; val++;
             feat2prop(featurestr);
-            if (!strcmp(featurestr, "xlevel")) {
-                char *err;
-                char num[32];
-
-                numvalue = strtoul(val, &err, 0);
-                if (!*val || *err) {
-                    error_setg(errp, "bad numerical value %s", val);
-                    return;
-                }
-                if (numvalue < 0x80000000) {
-                    error_report("xlevel value shall always be >= 0x80000000"
-                                 ", fixup will be removed in future versions");
-                    numvalue += 0x80000000;
-                }
-                snprintf(num, sizeof(num), "%" PRIu32, numvalue);
-                object_property_parse(OBJECT(cpu), num, featurestr, 
&local_err);
-            } else if (!strcmp(featurestr, "tsc-freq")) {
+            if (!strcmp(featurestr, "tsc-freq")) {
                 int64_t tsc_freq;
                 char *err;
                 char num[32];
@@ -1997,23 +1980,6 @@ static void x86_cpu_parse_featurestr(CPUState *cs, char 
*features,
                 snprintf(num, sizeof(num), "%" PRId64, tsc_freq);
                 object_property_parse(OBJECT(cpu), num, "tsc-frequency",
                                       &local_err);
-            } else if (!strcmp(featurestr, "hv-spinlocks")) {
-                char *err;
-                const int min = 0xFFF;
-                char num[32];
-                numvalue = strtoul(val, &err, 0);
-                if (!*val || *err) {
-                    error_setg(errp, "bad numerical value %s", val);
-                    return;
-                }
-                if (numvalue < min) {
-                    error_report("hv-spinlocks value shall always be >= 0x%x"
-                                 ", fixup will be removed in future versions",
-                                 min);
-                    numvalue = min;
-                }
-                snprintf(num, sizeof(num), "%" PRId32, numvalue);
-                object_property_parse(OBJECT(cpu), num, featurestr, 
&local_err);
             } else {
                 object_property_parse(OBJECT(cpu), val, featurestr, 
&local_err);
             }
-- 
2.5.5