Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/7] cpu: add i386 cpu hot remove support

[Igor Mammedov]

On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 15:27:17 +0200
Eduardo Otubo <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 03=24=14PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 14:12:49 +0200
> > Eduardo Otubo <address@hidden> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 09=45=57AM +0800, Zhu Guihua wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > On 07/09/2015 10:25 PM, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
> > > > >On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11=37=43AM +0800, Zhu Guihua wrote:
> > > > >>Hi,
> > > > >>On 06/24/2015 09:28 PM, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
> > > > >>>Hello Zhu,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>Are you still working on this feature? Could you provide a
> > > > >>>rebased version of this series?
> > > > >>Sorry for late reply.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Yes, we are still working on this feature.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>I have updated my github, you can get the rebased version
> > > > >>from it.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>https://github.com/zhuguihua/qemu.git  cpu-hotplug
> > > > >Hi, thanks a lot for rebasing it. I didn't have time to test
> > > > >it, though. I appologise.
> > > > >
> > > > >Regarding your branch, your plan is to stick with device_del
> > > > >and object_del interface?
> > > > 
> > > > Yeah, we will only stick with device_del interface.
> > > > There is no need to use object_del interface for cpu hot remove.
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Zhu
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > This is almost a year old email, but I decided to git it a try
> > > anyway. Are you still working on this? I'm trying your patches
> > > and it seems I had a simple issue: EJ0 is sent, guest ack's and
> > > removes the CPU, but it get's stuck somewhere between the BIOS
> > > and Qemu. CPU is successfully removed from the guest, but it
> > > still appears on QOM:
> > I'm working on new version and I plan to post patches this week.
> > 
> 
> I saw your RFCs. Will your new patches include QMP/HMP interface?
interface is already in master with spapr cpu hotplug support.
my patches will provide x86 implementation of it.

> Looking forward to test.
> 
> regards,
>