qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 6/8] linux-user: Support CPU work queue


From: Sergey Fedorov
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 6/8] linux-user: Support CPU work queue
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:56:41 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0

On 30/06/16 13:35, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
> On 30/06/16 13:32, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Sergey Fedorov <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> On 29/06/16 19:17, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>>> So I think there is a deadlock we can get with the async work:
>>>>
>>>> (gdb) thread apply all bt
>>>>
>>>> Thread 11 (Thread 0x7ffefeca7700 (LWP 2912)):
>>>> #0  pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () at 
>>>> ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/pthread_cond_wait.S:185
>>>> #1  0x00005555555cb777 in wait_cpu_work () at 
>>>> /home/alex/lsrc/qemu/qemu.git/linux-user/main.c:155
>>>> #2  0x00005555555a0cee in wait_safe_cpu_work () at 
>>>> /home/alex/lsrc/qemu/qemu.git/cpu-exec-common.c:87
>>>> #3  0x00005555555cb8fe in cpu_exec_end (cpu=0x555555bb67e0) at 
>>>> /home/alex/lsrc/qemu/qemu.git/linux-user/main.c:222
>>>> #4  0x00005555555cc7a7 in cpu_loop (env=0x555555bbea58) at 
>>>> /home/alex/lsrc/qemu/qemu.git/linux-user/main.c:749
>>>> #5  0x00005555555db0b2 in clone_func (arg=0x7fffffffc9c0) at 
>>>> /home/alex/lsrc/qemu/qemu.git/linux-user/syscall.c:5424
>>>> #6  0x00007ffff6bed6fa in start_thread (arg=0x7ffefeca7700) at 
>>>> pthread_create.c:333
>>>> #7  0x00007ffff6923b5d in clone () at 
>>>> ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:109
>>>>
>>>> <a bunch of other threads doing the same and then...>
>>>>
>>>> Thread 3 (Thread 0x7ffff7f38700 (LWP 2904)):
>>>> #0  0x00005555555faf5d in safe_syscall_base ()
>>>> #1  0x00005555555cfeaf in safe_futex (uaddr=0x7ffff528a0a4, op=128, val=1, 
>>>> timeout=0x0, uaddr2=0x0, val3=-162668384)
>>>>     at /home/alex/lsrc/qemu/qemu.git/linux-user/syscall.c:706
>>>> #2  0x00005555555dd7cc in do_futex (uaddr=4132298916, op=128, val=1, 
>>>> timeout=0, uaddr2=0, val3=-162668384)
>>>>     at /home/alex/lsrc/qemu/qemu.git/linux-user/syscall.c:6246
>>>> #3  0x00005555555e8cdb in do_syscall (cpu_env=0x555555a81118, num=240, 
>>>> arg1=-162668380, arg2=128, arg3=1, arg4=0, arg5=0, arg6=-162668384,
>>>>     arg7=0, arg8=0) at 
>>>> /home/alex/lsrc/qemu/qemu.git/linux-user/syscall.c:10642
>>>> #4  0x00005555555cd20e in cpu_loop (env=0x555555a81118) at 
>>>> /home/alex/lsrc/qemu/qemu.git/linux-user/main.c:883
>>>> #5  0x00005555555db0b2 in clone_func (arg=0x7fffffffc9c0) at 
>>>> /home/alex/lsrc/qemu/qemu.git/linux-user/syscall.c:5424
>>>> #6  0x00007ffff6bed6fa in start_thread (arg=0x7ffff7f38700) at 
>>>> pthread_create.c:333
>>>> #7  0x00007ffff6923b5d in clone () at 
>>>> ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:109
>>>>
>>>> So everything is stalled awaiting this thread waking up and draining
>>>> its queue. So for linux-user I think we need some mechanism to kick
>>>> these syscalls which I assume means throwing a signal at it.
>>> Nice catch! How did you get it?
>> Running pigz (armhf, debian) to compress stuff.
>>
>>> We always go through cpu_exec_end()
>>> before serving a guest syscall and always go through cpu_exec_start()
>>> before entering the guest code execution loop. If we always schedule
>>> safe work on the current thread's queue then I think there's a way to
>>> make it safe and avoid kicking syscalls.
>> Not let the signals complete until safe work is done?
> I'm thinking of waiting for completion of safe works in cpu_exec_start()
> as well as in cpu_exec_end().

I found a mistake in my code which causes deadlocks in my run of pigz.
Could you also try running it after applying the following patch?

diff --git a/linux-user/main.c b/linux-user/main.c
index 6da3bb32186b..1dca55145c56 100644
--- a/linux-user/main.c
+++ b/linux-user/main.c
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static inline void cpu_exec_end(CPUState *cpu)
     cpu->running = false;
     tcg_pending_cpus--;
     if (!tcg_pending_cpus) {
-        pthread_cond_broadcast(&exclusive_cond);
+        signal_cpu_work();
     }
     exclusive_idle();
     flush_queued_work(cpu);


Thanks,
Sergey



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]