qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 3/5] spapr: Implement CPUClass::get_migra


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 3/5] spapr: Implement CPUClass::get_migration_id() for PowerPC CPUs
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 10:57:28 +1000
User-agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)

On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 07:51:01PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:01:14PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Wed,  6 Jul 2016 14:29:19 +0530
> > Bharata B Rao <address@hidden> wrote:
> > 
> > > cpu_index is used as migration_id by default. For machine type
> > > versions that set use-migration-id property, cpu_dt_it is returned.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > >  target-ppc/translate_init.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/target-ppc/translate_init.c b/target-ppc/translate_init.c
> > > index efd6b88..9ca2f5e 100644
> > > --- a/target-ppc/translate_init.c
> > > +++ b/target-ppc/translate_init.c
> > > @@ -10359,6 +10359,17 @@ static gchar *ppc_gdb_arch_name(CPUState *cs)
> > >  #endif
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static int ppc_cpu_get_migration_id(CPUState *cs)
> > > +{
> > > +    PowerPCCPU *cpu = POWERPC_CPU(cs);
> > > +
> > > +    if (cs->use_migration_id) {
> > > +        return (int) cpu->cpu_dt_id;
> > Could cpu_dt_id have value bigger than 32bit int? If yes, it's not safe
> > to do so, that's the reason why I'm going to use index in possible_cpus
> > on ARM and for the sake of uniformity do the same for x86 (even though
> > it's possible to use 32bit APIC ID).
> 
> For the existing max_cpus limit, 32 bit should be fine, but obviously
> that is not good and future safe.

I think we should be OK.  The hardware IDs these are modelled on are
32-bit - I'm pretty sure #address-cells in /cpus is 1, not 2.

And even with a lot of wastage for alignment gaps of various sorts,
we're a *long* way off from supporting 4 billion cpus...

> I had a brief look at the implementation around possible_cpus in
> x86, let me see if I can do something similar for generating stable
> ids for PowerPC. I thought device tree ID would be our stable id, but
> that being 64 bit and migration code requiring 32 bit value isn't
> helping :(
> 
> Regards,
> Bharata.
> 

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]