qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 04/28] x86-iommu: q35: generalize find_add_a


From: Peter Xu
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 04/28] x86-iommu: q35: generalize find_add_as()
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 14:49:04 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 08:46:12AM +0300, David Kiarie wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Peter Xu <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 10:14:48AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> On 2016-07-05 10:19, Peter Xu wrote:
> >> > Remove VT-d calls in common q35 codes. Instead, we provide a general
> >> > find_add_as() for x86-iommu type.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <address@hidden>
> >> > ---
> >> >  hw/i386/intel_iommu.c         | 15 ++++++++-------
> >> >  include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h |  5 -----
> >> >  include/hw/i386/x86-iommu.h   |  3 +++
> >> >  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> You claim to remove something from "common q35 code", but I don't see
> >> changes to it. Instead, the patch introduces a method that seems to
> >> remain unused outside the implementing class (I just grep'ed your tree).
> >> Anything missing?
> >
> > Right. The commit message lost its point after I did the rebase to
> > Marcel's "-device intel_iommu" patches... Thanks for pointing it out.
> 
> I think Jan is mainly asking about where the method 'find_add_as()' is
> being used. Unless I'm too missing something It doesn't seem to be
> used anywhere outside the implementing class.

This patch can be dropped. I was just not sure whether it's the
correct time to do that. Anyway, we may still need one more patch to
cleanup this in the future, as I have mentioned in the previous email.

I see that mst is possibly not around these two days. Let me prepare a
v12 before he comes back. Thank you.

-- peterx



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]