qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] atomics: add volatile_read/volatile_set


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] atomics: add volatile_read/volatile_set
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 16:17:30 +0200

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
---
 docs/atomics.txt      | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
 include/qemu/atomic.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/atomics.txt b/docs/atomics.txt
index c95950b..1f21d2e 100644
--- a/docs/atomics.txt
+++ b/docs/atomics.txt
@@ -123,6 +123,14 @@ to do so, because it tells readers which variables are 
shared with
 other threads, and which are local to the current thread or protected
 by other, more mundane means.
 
+atomic_read() and atomic_set() only support accesses as large as a
+pointer.  If you need to access variables larger than a pointer you
+can use volatile_read() and volatile_set(), but be careful: these always
+use volatile accesses, and 64-bit volatile accesses are not atomic on
+several 32-bit processors such as ARMv7.  In other words, volatile_read
+and volatile_set only provide "safe register" semantics when applied to
+64-bit variables.
+
 Memory barriers control the order of references to shared memory.
 They come in four kinds:
 
@@ -335,11 +343,16 @@ and memory barriers, and the equivalents in QEMU:
   Both semantics prevent the compiler from doing certain transformations;
   the difference is that atomic accesses are guaranteed to be atomic,
   while volatile accesses aren't. Thus, in the volatile case we just cross
-  our fingers hoping that the compiler will generate atomic accesses,
-  since we assume the variables passed are machine-word sized and
-  properly aligned.
+  our fingers hoping that the compiler and processor will provide atomic
+  accesses, since we assume the variables passed are machine-word sized
+  and properly aligned.
+
   No barriers are implied by atomic_read/set in either Linux or QEMU.
 
+- volatile_read and volatile_set are equivalent to ACCESS_ONCE in Linux.
+  No barriers are implied by volatile_read/set in QEMU, nor by
+  ACCESS_ONCE in Linux.
+
 - atomic read-modify-write operations in Linux are of three kinds:
 
          atomic_OP          returns void
diff --git a/include/qemu/atomic.h b/include/qemu/atomic.h
index 7e13fca..8409bdb 100644
--- a/include/qemu/atomic.h
+++ b/include/qemu/atomic.h
@@ -18,6 +18,12 @@
 /* Compiler barrier */
 #define barrier()   ({ asm volatile("" ::: "memory"); (void)0; })
 
+/* These will only be atomic if the processor does the fetch or store
+ * in a single issue memory operation
+ */
+#define volatile_read(ptr)       (*(__typeof__(*ptr) volatile*) (ptr))
+#define volatile_set(ptr, i)     ((*(__typeof__(*ptr) volatile*) (ptr)) = (i))
+
 #ifdef __ATOMIC_RELAXED
 /* For C11 atomic ops */
 
@@ -260,6 +266,17 @@
  */
 #define atomic_read(ptr)       (*(__typeof__(*ptr) volatile*) (ptr))
 #define atomic_set(ptr, i)     ((*(__typeof__(*ptr) volatile*) (ptr)) = (i))
+#define atomic_read(ptr)                              \
+    ({                                                \
+    QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*ptr) > sizeof(void *)); \
+    volatile_read(ptr);                               \
+    })
+
+#define atomic_set(ptr, i)  do {                      \
+    QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*ptr) > sizeof(void *)); \
+    volatile_set(ptr, i);                             \
+} while(0)
+
 
 /**
  * atomic_rcu_read - reads a RCU-protected pointer to a local variable
-- 
2.7.4




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]