qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PULL 19/28] pc: Enforce adding CPUs contiguously and remov


From: Eduardo Habkost
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 19/28] pc: Enforce adding CPUs contiguously and removing them in opposite order
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 12:08:25 -0300

From: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>

It will still allow us to use cpu_index as migration instance_id
since when CPUs are added contiguously (from the first to the last)
and removed in opposite order, cpu_index stays stable and it's
reproducible on destination side.

While there is work in progress to support migration when there
are holes in cpu_index range resulting from out-of-order plug or
unplug, this patch is intended as an interim solution until
cpu_index usage is cleaned up.

As result of this patch it would be possible to plug/unplug CPUs,
but in limited order that doesn't break migration.

Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden>
---
 hw/i386/pc.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
index dd5661a..68d8cad 100644
--- a/hw/i386/pc.c
+++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
@@ -1815,6 +1815,23 @@ static void pc_cpu_unplug_request_cb(HotplugHandler 
*hotplug_dev,
         goto out;
     }
 
+    if (idx < pcms->possible_cpus->len - 1 &&
+        pcms->possible_cpus->cpus[idx + 1].cpu != NULL) {
+        X86CPU *cpu;
+
+        for (idx = pcms->possible_cpus->len - 1;
+             pcms->possible_cpus->cpus[idx].cpu == NULL; idx--) {
+            ;;
+        }
+
+        cpu = X86_CPU(pcms->possible_cpus->cpus[idx].cpu);
+        error_setg(&local_err, "CPU [socket-id: %u, core-id: %u,"
+                   " thread-id: %u] should be removed first",
+                   cpu->socket_id, cpu->core_id, cpu->thread_id);
+        goto out;
+
+    }
+
     hhc = HOTPLUG_HANDLER_GET_CLASS(pcms->acpi_dev);
     hhc->unplug_request(HOTPLUG_HANDLER(pcms->acpi_dev), dev, &local_err);
 
@@ -1912,6 +1929,23 @@ static void pc_cpu_pre_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
         return;
     }
 
+    if (idx != 0 && pcms->possible_cpus->cpus[idx - 1].cpu == NULL) {
+        PCMachineClass *pcmc = PC_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(pcms);
+
+        for (idx = 1; pcms->possible_cpus->cpus[idx].cpu != NULL; idx++) {
+            ;;
+        }
+
+        x86_topo_ids_from_apicid(pcms->possible_cpus->cpus[idx].arch_id,
+                                 smp_cores, smp_threads, &topo);
+
+        if (!pcmc->legacy_cpu_hotplug) {
+            error_setg(errp, "CPU [socket: %u, core: %u, thread: %u] should be"
+                       " added first", topo.pkg_id, topo.core_id, topo.smt_id);
+            return;
+        }
+    }
+
     /* if 'address' properties socket-id/core-id/thread-id are not set, set 
them
      * so that query_hotpluggable_cpus would show correct values
      */
-- 
2.5.5




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]