qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/2] vhost-user: Extend protocol to receive r


From: Prerna Saxena
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/2] vhost-user: Extend protocol to receive replies on any command.
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 10:00:06 +0000





On 27/07/16 9:51 am, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <address@hidden> wrote:

>On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 02:27:18PM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
>> Hi
>> 
>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Prerna <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Prerna Saxena <address@hidden>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> From: Prerna Saxena <address@hidden>
>> >>
>> >> The current vhost-user protocol requires the client to send responses to
>> >> only a
>> >> few commands. For the remaining commands, it is impossible for QEMU to
>> >> know the
>> >> status of the requested operation -- ie, did it succeed? If so, by what
>> >> time?
>> >>
>> >> This is inconvenient, and can also lead to races. As an example:
>> >>  [..snip..]
>> >>
>> >> References:
>> >> v1 : https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-06/msg07152.html
>> >> v2 : https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-07/msg00048.html
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Prerna Saxena (2):
>> >>   vhost-user: Introduce a new protocol feature REPLY_ACK.
>> >>   vhost-user: Attempt to fix a race with set_mem_table.
>> >>
>> >>  docs/specs/vhost-user.txt |  44 +++++++++++++++
>> >>  hw/virtio/vhost-user.c    | 133
>> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>> >>  2 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >
>> > Ping !
>> > Michael, MarcAndre, Did you have a chance to look at this patch series?
>> >
>> 
>> That's not going to make it in 2.7 I am afraid.
>
>It's a bugfix so - depends on how quickly can comments be addressed.
>
>-- 
>MST

Thanks Michael, Marc, 
I just posted a v4 addressing the review comments. Both make-check and 
compilation run to completion.

Marc,
I addressed part of your suggestion on documentation. However, I have been 
reminded in the past about being more verbose while describing the change : 
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-06/msg07428.html>

Hope this patch series is in time for 2.7 :-)

Regards,
Prerna

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]