qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7 1/2] throttle: Don't allow burst limits


From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7 1/2] throttle: Don't allow burst limits to be lower than the normal limits
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 16:33:51 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0

On 07/27/2016 04:16 PM, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> Setting FOO_max to a value that is lower than FOO does not make
> sense, and it produces odd results depending on the value of
> FOO_max_length. Although the user should not set that configuration
> in the first place it's better to reject it explicitly.
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1355665
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alberto Garcia <address@hidden>
> Reported-by: Gu Nini <address@hidden>
> ---
>  util/throttle.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/util/throttle.c b/util/throttle.c
> index 654f95c..7a5c619 100644
> --- a/util/throttle.c
> +++ b/util/throttle.c
> @@ -348,6 +348,12 @@ bool throttle_is_valid(ThrottleConfig *cfg, Error **errp)
>                         " bps/iops values");
>              return false;
>          }
> +
> +        if (cfg->buckets[i].max && cfg->buckets[i].max < 
> cfg->buckets[i].avg) {
> +            error_setg(errp, "if bps_max/iops_max is set it cannot be lower"
> +                       " than the bps/iops values");

Feels a bit long, I'd be fine with "bps_max/iops_max must not be lower
than bps/iops values".  But the idea makes sense.


-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]