qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 15/19] tcg: drop global lock during TCG code ex


From: Alex Bennée
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 15/19] tcg: drop global lock during TCG code execution
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 14:51:13 +0100
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.17; emacs 25.1.4

Sergey Fedorov <address@hidden> writes:

> On 03/06/16 23:40, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>
> From: Jan Kiszka <address@hidden>
>
> (See http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/402092/focus=403090)
>
>> This finally allows TCG to benefit from the iothread introduction: Drop
>> the global mutex while running pure TCG CPU code. Reacquire the lock
>> when entering MMIO or PIO emulation, or when leaving the TCG loop.
>>
>> We have to revert a few optimization for the current TCG threading
>> model, namely kicking the TCG thread in qemu_mutex_lock_iothread and not
>> kicking it in qemu_cpu_kick. We also need to disable RAM block
>> reordering until we have a more efficient locking mechanism at hand.
>>
>> Still, a Linux x86 UP guest and my Musicpal ARM model boot fine here.
>> These numbers demonstrate where we gain something:
>>
>> 20338 jan       20   0  331m  75m 6904 R   99  0.9   0:50.95 qemu-system-arm
>> 20337 jan       20   0  331m  75m 6904 S   20  0.9   0:26.50 qemu-system-arm
>>
>> The guest CPU was fully loaded, but the iothread could still run mostly
>> independent on a second core. Without the patch we don't get beyond
>>
>> 32206 jan       20   0  330m  73m 7036 R   82  0.9   1:06.00 qemu-system-arm
>> 32204 jan       20   0  330m  73m 7036 S   21  0.9   0:17.03 qemu-system-arm
>>
>> We don't benefit significantly, though, when the guest is not fully
>> loading a host CPU.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <address@hidden>
>> Message-Id: <address@hidden>
>> [FK: Rebase, fix qemu_devices_reset deadlock, rm address_space_* mutex]
>> Signed-off-by: KONRAD Frederic <address@hidden>
>> [EGC: fixed iothread lock for cpu-exec IRQ handling]
>> Signed-off-by: Emilio G. Cota <address@hidden>
>> [AJB: -smp single-threaded fix, rm old info from commit msg]
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <address@hidden>
>>
> (snip)
>> diff --git a/cpu-exec.c b/cpu-exec.c
>> index 1613c63..e1fb9ca 100644
>> --- a/cpu-exec.c
>> +++ b/cpu-exec.c
>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>>  #include "qemu/rcu.h"
>>  #include "exec/tb-hash.h"
>>  #include "exec/log.h"
>> +#include "qemu/main-loop.h"
>>  #if defined(TARGET_I386) && !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
>>  #include "hw/i386/apic.h"
>>  #endif
>> @@ -460,6 +461,8 @@ static inline void cpu_handle_interrupt(CPUState *cpu,
>>      int interrupt_request = cpu->interrupt_request;
>>
>>      if (unlikely(interrupt_request)) {
>> +        qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
>> +
>
> cpu_handle_halt() for target-i386 also needs to protect
> 'cpu->interrupt_request' with the global lock.
>
>>          if (unlikely(cpu->singlestep_enabled & SSTEP_NOIRQ)) {
>>              /* Mask out external interrupts for this step. */
>>              interrupt_request &= ~CPU_INTERRUPT_SSTEP_MASK;
>> @@ -514,6 +517,10 @@ static inline void cpu_handle_interrupt(CPUState *cpu,
>>                 the program flow was changed */
>>              *last_tb = NULL;
>>          }
>> +
>> +        /* If we exit via cpu_loop_exit/longjmp it is reset in cpu_exec */
>> +        qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
>> +
>>      }
>>      if (unlikely(cpu->exit_request || replay_has_interrupt())) {
>>          cpu->exit_request = 0;
> (snip)
>> diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
>> index e23039c..b7744b9 100644
>> --- a/exec.c
>> +++ b/exec.c
>> @@ -2149,9 +2149,9 @@ static void check_watchpoint(int offset, int len, 
>> MemTxAttrs attrs, int flags)
>>                  }
>>                  cpu->watchpoint_hit = wp;
>>
>> -                /* The tb_lock will be reset when cpu_loop_exit or
>> -                 * cpu_resume_from_signal longjmp back into the cpu_exec
>> -                 * main loop.
>> +                /* Both tb_lock and iothread_mutex will be reset when
>> +                 * cpu_loop_exit or cpu_resume_from_signal longjmp
>> +                 * back into the cpu_exec main loop.
>>                   */
>>                  tb_lock();
>>                  tb_check_watchpoint(cpu);
>> @@ -2387,8 +2387,14 @@ static void io_mem_init(void)
>>      memory_region_init_io(&io_mem_rom, NULL, &unassigned_mem_ops, NULL, 
>> NULL, UINT64_MAX);
>>      memory_region_init_io(&io_mem_unassigned, NULL, &unassigned_mem_ops, 
>> NULL,
>>                            NULL, UINT64_MAX);
>> +
>> +    /* io_mem_notdirty calls tb_invalidate_phys_page_fast,
>> +     * which must be called without the iothread mutex.
>
> "must" or "can"?
>
>> +     */
>>      memory_region_init_io(&io_mem_notdirty, NULL, &notdirty_mem_ops, NULL,
>>                            NULL, UINT64_MAX);
>> +    memory_region_clear_global_locking(&io_mem_notdirty);
>> +
>>      memory_region_init_io(&io_mem_watch, NULL, &watch_mem_ops, NULL,
>>                            NULL, UINT64_MAX);
>>  }
> (snip)
>> diff --git a/target-i386/smm_helper.c b/target-i386/smm_helper.c
>> index 4dd6a2c..6a5489b 100644
>> --- a/target-i386/smm_helper.c
>> +++ b/target-i386/smm_helper.c
>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>>   */
>>
>>  #include "qemu/osdep.h"
>> +#include "qemu/main-loop.h"
>>  #include "cpu.h"
>>  #include "exec/helper-proto.h"
>>  #include "exec/log.h"
>> @@ -42,11 +43,14 @@ void helper_rsm(CPUX86State *env)
>>  #define SMM_REVISION_ID 0x00020000
>>  #endif
>>
>> +/* Called we iothread lock taken */
>
> s/we/with/
>
>>  void cpu_smm_update(X86CPU *cpu)
>>  {
>>      CPUX86State *env = &cpu->env;
>>      bool smm_enabled = (env->hflags & HF_SMM_MASK);
>>
>> +    g_assert(qemu_mutex_iothread_locked());
>> +
>>      if (cpu->smram) {
>>          memory_region_set_enabled(cpu->smram, smm_enabled);
>>      }
>> @@ -333,7 +337,10 @@ void helper_rsm(CPUX86State *env)
>>      }
>>      env->hflags2 &= ~HF2_SMM_INSIDE_NMI_MASK;
>>      env->hflags &= ~HF_SMM_MASK;
>> +
>> +    qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
>>      cpu_smm_update(cpu);
>> +    qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
>
> I'm wondering if there are some other similar places to take the global
> lock.

The two main routes to messing with the IRQ as through helpers (no lock
held by default) and MMIO (generally the global lock is held unless the
region is explicitly unlocked).

For simplicity for cpu_reset_interrupt I take the lock if it is not
already held. cpu_interrupt assumes the lock is held and asserts it now.

>
>>
>>      qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_INT, "SMM: after RSM\n");
>>      log_cpu_state_mask(CPU_LOG_INT, CPU(cpu), CPU_DUMP_CCOP);
> (snip)
>
> Kind regards
> Sergey


--
Alex Bennée



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]