qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v4 6/9] ppc/xics: Split ICS into ics-


From: Cédric Le Goater
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v4 6/9] ppc/xics: Split ICS into ics-base and ics class
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:13:45 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0

On 09/20/2016 08:29 AM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>> On 09/20/2016 08:02 AM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
>>> Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 09/19/2016 08:29 AM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
>>>>> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <address@hidden>
>>>>>
>>>>> The existing implementation remains same and ics-base is introduced. The
>>>>> type name "ics" is retained, and all the related functions renamed as
>>>>> ics_simple_*
>>>>>
>>>>> This will allow different implementations for the source controllers
>>>>> such as the MSI support of PHB3 on Power8 which uses in-memory state
>>>>> tables for example.
>>>>
>>>> A couple of issues below regarding the class helpers,
>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <address@hidden>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <address@hidden>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  hw/intc/trace-events  |  10 ++--
>>>>>  hw/intc/xics.c        | 143 
>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>>>>>  hw/intc/xics_kvm.c    |  10 ++--
>>>>>  hw/intc/xics_spapr.c  |  28 +++++-----
>>>>>  include/hw/ppc/xics.h |  23 +++++---
>>>>>  5 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)

>>>>> @@ -224,9 +224,32 @@ static const TypeInfo xics_common_info = {
>>>>>  #define XISR(ss)   (((ss)->xirr) & XISR_MASK)
>>>>>  #define CPPR(ss)   (((ss)->xirr) >> 24)
>>>>>  
>>>>> -static void ics_reject(ICSState *ics, int nr);
>>>>> -static void ics_resend(ICSState *ics, int server);
>>>>> -static void ics_eoi(ICSState *ics, int nr);
>>>>> +static void ics_reject(ICSState *ics, uint32_t nr)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +    ICSStateClass *k = ICS_GET_CLASS(ics);
>>>>
>>>> Shouldn't that be ICS_BASE_GET_CLASS()
>>>
>>> The class hierarchy is something like this:
>>>
>>> ICS_BASE -> ICS_SIMPLE -> ICS_KVM
>>
>> yes. but if we called  ics_* with an instance of an ics class which is 
>> not a ICS_SIMPLE class that will break.
> 
> Correct
> 
>> ICSStateClass is the baseclass, whenever we call methods on a ICSState* 
>> object, we should use the method defines in ICSStateClass.
> 
> Hmm, in that case I need to initialize base class methods in
> instance_init of ics_simple

yes but this is done, no ? I see : 

static void ics_simple_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
{
    DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
    ICSStateClass *isc = ICS_BASE_CLASS(klass);

    dc->realize = ics_simple_realize;
    dc->vmsd = &vmstate_ics_simple;
    dc->reset = ics_simple_reset;
    isc->post_load = ics_simple_post_load;
    isc->reject = ics_simple_reject;
    isc->resend = ics_simple_resend;
    isc->eoi = ics_simple_eoi;
}

Thanks,

C. 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]