[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/20] exec: split cpu_exec_init()
From: |
Laurent Vivier |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/20] exec: split cpu_exec_init() |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Oct 2016 15:57:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 |
On 14/10/2016 15:55, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 18:24:43 +0200
> Laurent Vivier <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> [...]
>> Rename cpu_exec_exit() with cpu_exec_unrealize():
>> cpu_exec_exit() is undoing what it has been done by cpu_exec_realize(), so
>> call it cpu_exec_unrealize().
> a separate patch???
>
> [...]
>
>> diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
>> index 374c364..885dc79 100644
>> --- a/exec.c
>> +++ b/exec.c
>> @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ AddressSpace *cpu_get_address_space(CPUState *cpu, int
>> asidx)
>> }
>> #endif
>>
>> -void cpu_exec_exit(CPUState *cpu)
>> +void cpu_exec_unrealize(CPUState *cpu)
> [...]
>
>> static void cpu_common_finalize(Object *obj)
>> {
>> CPUState *cpu = CPU(obj);
>> - cpu_exec_exit(cpu);
>> + cpu_exec_unrealize(CPU(obj));
> if it's unrealize then it should be called at cpu_unrealize() time
> and not at _finalize().
>
> We've skipped this change during previous release merge window
> because it was too late and would touch all targets and make already
> huge hotplug series even bigger.
> Now since you are doing all targets sweep/cleanup anyway,
> it's good time to move it to unrealize() time.
Yes, v3 will do that.
Laurent