qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/20] exec: split cpu_exec_init()


From: Laurent Vivier
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/20] exec: split cpu_exec_init()
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 15:57:33 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0


On 14/10/2016 15:55, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 18:24:43 +0200
> Laurent Vivier <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> [...]
>> Rename cpu_exec_exit() with cpu_exec_unrealize():
>> cpu_exec_exit() is undoing what it has been done by cpu_exec_realize(), so
>> call it cpu_exec_unrealize().
> a separate patch???
> 
> [...]
> 
>> diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
>> index 374c364..885dc79 100644
>> --- a/exec.c
>> +++ b/exec.c
>> @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ AddressSpace *cpu_get_address_space(CPUState *cpu, int 
>> asidx)
>>  }
>>  #endif
>>  
>> -void cpu_exec_exit(CPUState *cpu)
>> +void cpu_exec_unrealize(CPUState *cpu)
> [...]
> 
>>  static void cpu_common_finalize(Object *obj)
>>  {
>>      CPUState *cpu = CPU(obj);
>> -    cpu_exec_exit(cpu);
>> +    cpu_exec_unrealize(CPU(obj));
> if it's unrealize then it should be called at cpu_unrealize() time
> and not at _finalize().
> 
> We've skipped this change during previous release merge window
> because it was too late and would touch all targets and make already
> huge hotplug series even bigger.
> Now since you are doing all targets sweep/cleanup anyway,
> it's good time to move it to unrealize() time.

Yes, v3 will do that.

Laurent



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]