Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] gdbstub: Fix vCont behaviour

[Claudio Imbrenda]

On 27/10/16 13:40, Pedro Alves wrote:
> I'm not a qemu gdbstub expert, but FYI, seeing this reminded me to push
> to gdb's master a (getting old) gdb patch that clarifies how vCont actions
> should be interpreted:
> 
>  https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-02/msg00493.html
> 
> It's already live at:
> 
>  https://sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb/Packets.html
> 
> (The "already running" case is for non-stop mode, which qemu
> probably doesn't support.)

>From the new specifications I seem to understand that if I specify a
default as first action, then no further actions will be considered,
since it matches all threads?

e.g. vCont;c;s:1  will ignore the s:1 because the c was specified
earlier and it matches all threads, and therefore it's the leftmost
match? do I understand correctly?

Or does the default only match any thread without an explicit match?
(which is how I interpreted the old spec)