qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PULL 05/30] exec.c: ensure all AddressSpaceDispatch update


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 05/30] exec.c: ensure all AddressSpaceDispatch updates under RCU
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 17:29:18 +0100

From: Alex Bennée <address@hidden>

The memory_dispatch field is meant to be protected by RCU so we should
use the correct primitives when accessing it. This race was flagged up
by the ThreadSanitizer.

Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <address@hidden>
Message-Id: <address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
---
 exec.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
index 4d08581..a19ed21 100644
--- a/exec.c
+++ b/exec.c
@@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ address_space_translate_for_iotlb(CPUState *cpu, int asidx, 
hwaddr addr,
                                   hwaddr *xlat, hwaddr *plen)
 {
     MemoryRegionSection *section;
-    AddressSpaceDispatch *d = cpu->cpu_ases[asidx].memory_dispatch;
+    AddressSpaceDispatch *d = 
atomic_rcu_read(&cpu->cpu_ases[asidx].memory_dispatch);
 
     section = address_space_translate_internal(d, addr, xlat, plen, false);
 
@@ -2376,7 +2376,7 @@ static void tcg_commit(MemoryListener *listener)
      * may have split the RCU critical section.
      */
     d = atomic_rcu_read(&cpuas->as->dispatch);
-    cpuas->memory_dispatch = d;
+    atomic_rcu_set(&cpuas->memory_dispatch, d);
     tlb_flush(cpuas->cpu, 1);
 }
 
-- 
2.7.4





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]