qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/3] nvdimm acpi: introduce _FIT


From: Xiao Guangrong
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/3] nvdimm acpi: introduce _FIT
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 21:02:22 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0



On 11/03/2016 09:00 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:




just drop this and describe properly 'len' in spec section
i.e. len: length of entire returned data (including the header)

Okay, i will change the spec like this:

    QEMU Writes Output Data (based on the offset in the page):
    [0x0 - 0x3]: 4 bytes, length of entire returned data (including the header)

And drop the length field in Read_Fit return buffer, doc
the fit buffer like this:

    +----------+--------+--------+-------------------------------------------+
    |  Field   | Length | Offset |                 Description               |
    +----------+--------+--------+-------------------------------------------+
you need to add length here, otherwise this table is not correct

Ah, so i am confused.

struct NvdimmFuncReadFITOut definition is based on the layout of
Read_FI output. You suggested to drop the length filed in NvdimmFuncReadFITOut
but keep it in the layout, it is not consistent.

I missed something?



    |          |        |        | return status codes                       |
    |          |        |        | 0x100 - error caused by NFIT update while |
    | status   |   4    |   0    | read by _FIT wasn't completed, other      |
    |          |        |        | codes follow Chapter 3 in DSM Spec Rev1   |
    +----------+--------+--------+-------------------------------------------+
    | fit data | Varies |   8    | FIT data, The remaining size in the       |
    |          |        |        | returned buffer is used by FIT            |
    +----------+--------+--------+-------------------------------------------+



+}
+
+static void nvdimm_dsm_reserved_root(AcpiNVDIMMState *state, NvdimmDsmIn *in,
+                                     hwaddr dsm_mem_addr)
function name doesn't make any sense to me

As i explained above, handle 0x10000 indicates the reserved _DSM method is
called on the root device...

It makes sense now? :)
function name should reflect what it does,
i.e use verb and I see only nouns here.

Got it, will change it to: nvdimm_handle_reserved_root_method().




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]