Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/8] quorum: Implement .bdrv_co_preadv/pwritev()

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 18/11/2016 10:51, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> 
>>> >> Honestly I don't see the point.  It seems easier, more practical and
>>> >> more effective to convert bdrv_aio_* to byte ranges, especially since
>>> >> QED would be basically a rewrite.
>> >
>> > Well, it's an RFC for a reason, I want people to give their opinions
>> > before consistently following through with this. But I do think that
>> > we pointlessly offer too many different interfaces to do the same
>> > thing in the block layer.
> I cannot speak much about the AIO/coroutine interfaces (why do we have
> both? is the latter supposed to supersede the former? I'd appreciate
> some background here) but I did find the code easier to follow after
> these patches, so from that point of view the series looks good to me.

If you like it, who am I to say no! :)

Paolo