qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 4/4] arm/arm64: GICv3: add TYPER


From: Andrew Jones
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 4/4] arm/arm64: GICv3: add TYPER test
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 15:41:53 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.6.0.1 (2016-04-01)

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 05:57:52PM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Add a simple test for the GICv3 TYPER test, which does only one basic
> check to ensure we have actually enough interrupt IDs if we support
> LPIs.
> Allow a GICv3 guest to do the common MMIO checks as well, where the
> register semantics are shared with a GICv2.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <address@hidden>
> ---
>  arm/gic.c         | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  arm/unittests.cfg |  6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arm/gic.c b/arm/gic.c
> index 02b1be1..7de0e47 100644
> --- a/arm/gic.c
> +++ b/arm/gic.c
> @@ -327,6 +327,30 @@ static bool test_typer_v2(uint32_t reg)
>       return true;
>  }
>  
> +static bool test_typer_v3(uint32_t reg)
> +{
> +     int nr_intids;
> +
> +     report("GIC emulation %ssupport%s MBIs", 1,
> +            reg & BIT(16) ? "" : "does not ",
> +            reg & BIT(16) ? "s" : "");

Could just do the test once

 ("...%s...",  reg & BIT(16) ? "supports" : "does not support"

> +     report("GIC emulation %ssupport%s LPIs", 1,
> +            reg & BIT(17) ? "" : "does not ",
> +            reg & BIT(17) ? "s" : "");
> +     report("GIC emulation %ssupport%s Aff3", 1,
> +            reg & BIT(24) ? "" : "does not ",
> +            reg & BIT(24) ? "s" : "");
> +
> +     nr_intids = BIT(((reg >> 19) & 0x1f) + 1);
> +     report("%d interrupt IDs implemented", 1, nr_intids);
> +
> +     if (reg & BIT(17))
> +             report("%d LPIs supported", nr_intids > 8192,
> +                    nr_intids > 8192 ? nr_intids - 8192 : 0);

I'm wondering if we should try to keep the number of report lines
the same host to host. So anywhere we can't do a PASS/FAIL test we
should do a SKIP. Doing that will allow us to cleanly diff test
results between hosts. (I'm not sure I've been doing a good job of
that with the existing tests though...)

> +
> +     return true;

No need to return a value.

> +}
> +
>  #define BYTE(reg32, byte) (((reg32) >> ((byte) * 8)) & 0xff)
>  #define REPLACE_BYTE(reg32, byte, new) (((reg32) & ~(0xff << ((byte) * 8))) 
> |\
>                                       ((new) << ((byte) * 8)))
> @@ -460,8 +484,9 @@ static int gic_test_mmio(int gic_version)
>               idreg = gic_dist_base + 0xfe8;
>               break;
>       case 0x3:
> -             report_abort("GICv3 MMIO tests NYI");
> -             return -1;
> +             gic_dist_base = gicv3_dist_base();
> +             idreg = gic_dist_base + 0xffe8;

No define for this ID reg?

> +             break;
>       default:
>               report_abort("GIC version %d not supported", gic_version);
>               return 0;
> @@ -471,7 +496,10 @@ static int gic_test_mmio(int gic_version)
>       nr_irqs = 32 * ((reg & 0x1f) + 1);
>       report("number of implemented SPIs: %d", 1, nr_irqs - 32);
>  
> -     test_typer_v2(reg);
> +     if (gic_version == 2)
> +             test_typer_v2(reg);
> +     else
> +             test_typer_v3(reg);

Maybe we should use a switch here too, preparing for v4

>  
>       report("IIDR: 0x%x", 1, readl(gic_dist_base + GICD_IIDR));
>  
> diff --git a/arm/unittests.cfg b/arm/unittests.cfg
> index 0162e5a..b432346 100644
> --- a/arm/unittests.cfg
> +++ b/arm/unittests.cfg
> @@ -78,3 +78,9 @@ file = gic.flat
>  smp = $MAX_SMP
>  extra_params = -machine gic-version=3 -append 'ipi'
>  groups = gic
> +
> +[gicv3-mmio]
> +file = gic.flat
> +smp = $MAX_SMP
> +extra_params = -machine gic-version=3 -append 'mmio'
> +groups = gic
> -- 
> 2.9.0
> 
>

Thanks,
drew 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]