[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 4/4] arm/arm64: GICv3: add TYPER
From: |
Andrew Jones |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 4/4] arm/arm64: GICv3: add TYPER test |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Nov 2016 15:41:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.0.1 (2016-04-01) |
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 05:57:52PM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Add a simple test for the GICv3 TYPER test, which does only one basic
> check to ensure we have actually enough interrupt IDs if we support
> LPIs.
> Allow a GICv3 guest to do the common MMIO checks as well, where the
> register semantics are shared with a GICv2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <address@hidden>
> ---
> arm/gic.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> arm/unittests.cfg | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arm/gic.c b/arm/gic.c
> index 02b1be1..7de0e47 100644
> --- a/arm/gic.c
> +++ b/arm/gic.c
> @@ -327,6 +327,30 @@ static bool test_typer_v2(uint32_t reg)
> return true;
> }
>
> +static bool test_typer_v3(uint32_t reg)
> +{
> + int nr_intids;
> +
> + report("GIC emulation %ssupport%s MBIs", 1,
> + reg & BIT(16) ? "" : "does not ",
> + reg & BIT(16) ? "s" : "");
Could just do the test once
("...%s...", reg & BIT(16) ? "supports" : "does not support"
> + report("GIC emulation %ssupport%s LPIs", 1,
> + reg & BIT(17) ? "" : "does not ",
> + reg & BIT(17) ? "s" : "");
> + report("GIC emulation %ssupport%s Aff3", 1,
> + reg & BIT(24) ? "" : "does not ",
> + reg & BIT(24) ? "s" : "");
> +
> + nr_intids = BIT(((reg >> 19) & 0x1f) + 1);
> + report("%d interrupt IDs implemented", 1, nr_intids);
> +
> + if (reg & BIT(17))
> + report("%d LPIs supported", nr_intids > 8192,
> + nr_intids > 8192 ? nr_intids - 8192 : 0);
I'm wondering if we should try to keep the number of report lines
the same host to host. So anywhere we can't do a PASS/FAIL test we
should do a SKIP. Doing that will allow us to cleanly diff test
results between hosts. (I'm not sure I've been doing a good job of
that with the existing tests though...)
> +
> + return true;
No need to return a value.
> +}
> +
> #define BYTE(reg32, byte) (((reg32) >> ((byte) * 8)) & 0xff)
> #define REPLACE_BYTE(reg32, byte, new) (((reg32) & ~(0xff << ((byte) * 8)))
> |\
> ((new) << ((byte) * 8)))
> @@ -460,8 +484,9 @@ static int gic_test_mmio(int gic_version)
> idreg = gic_dist_base + 0xfe8;
> break;
> case 0x3:
> - report_abort("GICv3 MMIO tests NYI");
> - return -1;
> + gic_dist_base = gicv3_dist_base();
> + idreg = gic_dist_base + 0xffe8;
No define for this ID reg?
> + break;
> default:
> report_abort("GIC version %d not supported", gic_version);
> return 0;
> @@ -471,7 +496,10 @@ static int gic_test_mmio(int gic_version)
> nr_irqs = 32 * ((reg & 0x1f) + 1);
> report("number of implemented SPIs: %d", 1, nr_irqs - 32);
>
> - test_typer_v2(reg);
> + if (gic_version == 2)
> + test_typer_v2(reg);
> + else
> + test_typer_v3(reg);
Maybe we should use a switch here too, preparing for v4
>
> report("IIDR: 0x%x", 1, readl(gic_dist_base + GICD_IIDR));
>
> diff --git a/arm/unittests.cfg b/arm/unittests.cfg
> index 0162e5a..b432346 100644
> --- a/arm/unittests.cfg
> +++ b/arm/unittests.cfg
> @@ -78,3 +78,9 @@ file = gic.flat
> smp = $MAX_SMP
> extra_params = -machine gic-version=3 -append 'ipi'
> groups = gic
> +
> +[gicv3-mmio]
> +file = gic.flat
> +smp = $MAX_SMP
> +extra_params = -machine gic-version=3 -append 'mmio'
> +groups = gic
> --
> 2.9.0
>
>
Thanks,
drew
- [Qemu-devel] [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/4] arm/arm64: GICv2: add GICD_ITARGETSR testing, (continued)
[Qemu-devel] [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/4] arm/arm64: GIC: basic GICv2 MMIO tests, Andre Przywara, 2016/11/17
[Qemu-devel] [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 4/4] arm/arm64: GICv3: add TYPER test, Andre Przywara, 2016/11/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 4/4] arm/arm64: GICv3: add TYPER test,
Andrew Jones <=
Re: [Qemu-devel] [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/4] kvm-unit-tests: add first GIC MMIO tests, Itaru Kitayama, 2016/11/18