qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 11/11] arm/arm64: gic: don't j


From: Auger Eric
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6 11/11] arm/arm64: gic: don't just use zero
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 14:33:31 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0


On 23/11/2016 14:01, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:28:34PM +0100, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 14/11/2016 22:08, Andrew Jones wrote:
>>> Allow user to select who sends ipis and with which irq,
>>> rather than just always sending irq=0 from cpu0.
>> From a user point of view is there a way to know the list of available
>> tests and their arg?
> 
> Not at the moment. I could change the arg-less run and/or add
> a '-h' though that would provide a usage. So far unit tests
> have never had -h's, but it's not a bad idea.

OK thanks for the info
> 
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <address@hidden>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> v6:
>>>  - make sender/irq names more future-proof [drew]
>>>  - sanity check inputs [drew]
>>>  - introduce check_sender/irq and bad_sender/irq to more
>>>    cleanly do checks [drew]
>>>  - default sender and irq to 1, instead of still zero [drew]
>>> v4: improve structure and make sure spurious checking is
>>>     done even when the sender isn't cpu0
>>> v2: actually check that the irq received was the irq sent,
>>>     and (for gicv2) that the sender is the expected one.
>>> ---
>>>  arm/gic.c | 124 
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>>  1 file changed, 99 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arm/gic.c b/arm/gic.c
>>> index d954a3775c26..638b8b140c96 100644
>>> --- a/arm/gic.c
>>> +++ b/arm/gic.c
>>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>>>   * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU LGPL, version 2.
>>>   */
>>>  #include <libcflat.h>
>>> +#include <util.h>
>>>  #include <asm/setup.h>
>>>  #include <asm/processor.h>
>>>  #include <asm/gic.h>
>>> @@ -28,6 +29,8 @@ struct gic {
>>>  
>>>  static struct gic *gic;
>>>  static int acked[NR_CPUS], spurious[NR_CPUS];
>>> +static int bad_sender[NR_CPUS], bad_irq[NR_CPUS];
>>> +static int cmdl_sender = 1, cmdl_irq = 1;
>>>  static cpumask_t ready;
>>>  
>>>  static void nr_cpu_check(int nr)
>>> @@ -43,10 +46,23 @@ static void wait_on_ready(void)
>>>             cpu_relax();
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> +static void stats_reset(void)
>>> +{
>>> +   int i;
>>> +
>>> +   for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; ++i) {
>>> +           acked[i] = 0;
>>> +           bad_sender[i] = -1;
>>> +           bad_irq[i] = -1;
>>> +   }
>>> +   smp_wmb();
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  static void check_acked(cpumask_t *mask)
>>>  {
>>>     int missing = 0, extra = 0, unexpected = 0;
>>>     int nr_pass, cpu, i;
>>> +   bool bad = false;
>>>  
>>>     /* Wait up to 5s for all interrupts to be delivered */
>>>     for (i = 0; i < 50; ++i) {
>>> @@ -56,9 +72,21 @@ static void check_acked(cpumask_t *mask)
>>>                     smp_rmb();
>>>                     nr_pass += cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mask) ?
>>>                             acked[cpu] == 1 : acked[cpu] == 0;
>>> +
>>> +                   if (bad_sender[cpu] != -1) {
>>> +                           printf("cpu%d received IPI from wrong sender 
>>> %d\n",
>>> +                                   cpu, bad_sender[cpu]);
>>> +                           bad = true;
>>> +                   }
>>> +
>>> +                   if (bad_irq[cpu] != -1) {
>>> +                           printf("cpu%d received wrong irq %d\n",
>>> +                                   cpu, bad_irq[cpu]);
>>> +                           bad = true;
>>> +                   }
>>>             }
>>>             if (nr_pass == nr_cpus) {
>>> -                   report("Completed in %d ms", true, ++i * 100);
>>> +                   report("Completed in %d ms", !bad, ++i * 100);
>>>                     return;
>>>             }
>>>     }
>>> @@ -91,6 +119,22 @@ static void check_spurious(void)
>>>     }
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> +static void check_ipi_sender(u32 irqstat)
>>> +{
>>> +   if (gic_version() == 2) {
>>> +           int src = (irqstat >> 10) & 7;
>>> +
>>> +           if (src != cmdl_sender)
>>> +                   bad_sender[smp_processor_id()] = src;
>>> +   }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void check_irqnr(u32 irqnr)
>>> +{
>>> +   if (irqnr != (u32)cmdl_irq)
>>> +           bad_irq[smp_processor_id()] = irqnr;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  static void ipi_handler(struct pt_regs *regs __unused)
>>>  {
>>>     u32 irqstat = gic_read_iar();
>>> @@ -98,8 +142,10 @@ static void ipi_handler(struct pt_regs *regs __unused)
>>>  
>>>     if (irqnr != GICC_INT_SPURIOUS) {
>>>             gic_write_eoir(irqstat);
>>> -           smp_rmb(); /* pairs with wmb in ipi_test functions */
>>> +           smp_rmb(); /* pairs with wmb in stats_reset */
>>>             ++acked[smp_processor_id()];
>>> +           check_ipi_sender(irqstat);
>>> +           check_irqnr(irqnr);
>>>             smp_wmb(); /* pairs with rmb in check_acked */
>>>     } else {
>>>             ++spurious[smp_processor_id()];
>>> @@ -109,19 +155,19 @@ static void ipi_handler(struct pt_regs *regs __unused)
>>>  
>>>  static void gicv2_ipi_send_self(void)
>>>  {
>>> -   writel(2 << 24, gicv2_dist_base() + GICD_SGIR);
>>> +   writel(2 << 24 | cmdl_irq, gicv2_dist_base() + GICD_SGIR);
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> -static void gicv2_ipi_send_tlist(cpumask_t *mask, int irq __unused)
>>> +static void gicv2_ipi_send_tlist(cpumask_t *mask, int irq)
>>>  {
>>>     u8 tlist = (u8)cpumask_bits(mask)[0];
>>>  
>>> -   writel(tlist << 16, gicv2_dist_base() + GICD_SGIR);
>>> +   writel(tlist << 16 | irq, gicv2_dist_base() + GICD_SGIR);
>>>  }
>>>  
>>>  static void gicv2_ipi_send_broadcast(void)
>>>  {
>>> -   writel(1 << 24, gicv2_dist_base() + GICD_SGIR);
>>> +   writel(1 << 24 | cmdl_irq, gicv2_dist_base() + GICD_SGIR);
>>>  }
>>>  
>>>  static void gicv3_ipi_send_self(void)
>>> @@ -130,12 +176,12 @@ static void gicv3_ipi_send_self(void)
>>>  
>>>     cpumask_clear(&mask);
>>>     cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &mask);
>>> -   gicv3_ipi_send_tlist(&mask, 0);
>>> +   gicv3_ipi_send_tlist(&mask, cmdl_irq);
>>>  }
>>>  
>>>  static void gicv3_ipi_send_broadcast(void)
>>>  {
>>> -   gicv3_write_sgi1r(1ULL << 40);
>>> +   gicv3_write_sgi1r(1ULL << 40 | cmdl_irq << 24);
>>>     isb();
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> @@ -144,10 +190,9 @@ static void ipi_test_self(void)
>>>     cpumask_t mask;
>>>  
>>>     report_prefix_push("self");
>>> -   memset(acked, 0, sizeof(acked));
>>> -   smp_wmb();
>>> +   stats_reset();
>>>     cpumask_clear(&mask);
>>> -   cpumask_set_cpu(0, &mask);
>>> +   cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &mask);
>>>     gic->ipi.send_self();
>>>     check_acked(&mask);
>>>     report_prefix_pop();
>>> @@ -159,20 +204,18 @@ static void ipi_test_smp(void)
>>>     int i;
>>>  
>>>     report_prefix_push("target-list");
>>> -   memset(acked, 0, sizeof(acked));
>>> -   smp_wmb();
>>> +   stats_reset();
>>>     cpumask_copy(&mask, &cpu_present_mask);
>>> -   for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; i += 2)
>>> +   for (i = smp_processor_id() & 1; i < nr_cpus; i += 2)
>>>             cpumask_clear_cpu(i, &mask);
>>> -   gic->ipi.send_tlist(&mask, 0);
>>> +   gic->ipi.send_tlist(&mask, cmdl_irq);
>>>     check_acked(&mask);
>>>     report_prefix_pop();
>>>  
>>>     report_prefix_push("broadcast");
>>> -   memset(acked, 0, sizeof(acked));
>>> -   smp_wmb();
>>> +   stats_reset();
>>>     cpumask_copy(&mask, &cpu_present_mask);
>>> -   cpumask_clear_cpu(0, &mask);
>>> +   cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &mask);
>>>     gic->ipi.send_broadcast();
>>>     check_acked(&mask);
>>>     report_prefix_pop();
>>> @@ -189,6 +232,16 @@ static void ipi_enable(void)
>>>     local_irq_enable();
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> +static void ipi_send(void)
>>> +{
>>> +   ipi_enable();
>>> +   wait_on_ready();
>>> +   ipi_test_self();
>>> +   ipi_test_smp();
>>> +   check_spurious();
>>> +   exit(report_summary());
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  static void ipi_recv(void)
>>>  {
>>>     ipi_enable();
>>> @@ -197,6 +250,14 @@ static void ipi_recv(void)
>>>             wfi();
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> +static void ipi_test(void)
>>> +{
>>> +   if (smp_processor_id() == cmdl_sender)
>>> +           ipi_send();
>>> +   else
>>> +           ipi_recv();
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  static struct gic gicv2 = {
>>>     .ipi = {
>>>             .send_self = gicv2_ipi_send_self,
>>> @@ -242,21 +303,34 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>>>             report_prefix_pop();
>>>  
>>>     } else if (strcmp(argv[1], "ipi") == 0) {
>>> +           int off, i = 1;
>>> +           long val;
>>>  
>>>             report_prefix_push(argv[1]);
>>>             nr_cpu_check(2);
>>>  
>>> +           while (--argc != 1) {
>>> +                   off = parse_keyval(argv[++i], &val);
>>> +                   if (off == -1)
>>> +                           continue;
>>> +                   argv[i][off] = '\0';
>>> +                   if (strcmp(argv[i], "sender") == 0) {
>>> +                           if (val >= nr_cpus)
>>> +                                   report_abort("invalid sender %d, 
>>> nr_cpus=%d", val, nr_cpus);
>>> +                           cmdl_sender = val;
>>> +                   } else if (strcmp(argv[i], "irq") == 0) {
>>> +                           if (val > 15)
>>> +                                   report_abort("irq (SGI) must be < 16");
>>> +                           cmdl_irq = val;
>>> +                   }
>> wrong arg could potentially be tested.
> 
> What do you mean by 'wrong arg'? Can you give me an example?
I meant bad option, ie if the tester makes a typo such as sende=3, this
gets ignored, right?.

Thanks

Eric
> 
>>
>> Besides
>> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <address@hidden>
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> drew
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to address@hidden
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]