qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-stable] [PATCH v2] virtio-bus: Plug devices after


From: Maxime Coquelin
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-stable] [PATCH v2] virtio-bus: Plug devices after features are negotiated
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 10:44:05 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0



On 12/14/2016 09:59 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 08:41:55 +0000
Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden> wrote:

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Maxime Coquelin
<address@hidden> wrote:


On 12/14/2016 08:44 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:

14:44 < stefanha> Not sure if anyone can think of a nicer solution.
14:45 < stefanha> But we're going to have to keep lying to the guest if
we want to preserve migration compatibility
14:45 < stefanha> The key change in behavior with the patch you
identified is:
14:46 < stefanha> if (!virtio_has_feature(vdev->host_features,
VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) {
14:46 < stefanha> virtio_pci_disable_modern(proxy);
14:46 < stefanha> Previously it didn't care about vdev->host_features.
It simply allowed VERSION_1 when proxy's disable_modern boolean was false.
14:47 < mdroth> stefanha: ok, that explains why it seems to work with
disable-modern=true
14:48 < stefanha> mdroth: Your Ubuntu kernel old but 14.04 LTS is
definitely still around so I don't think we can ship QEMU 2.8 like this.
14:49 < stefanha> mdroth: Let's summarize it on the mailing list and
see what Michael Tsirkin and Maxime Coquelin think.
14:49 < mdroth> stefanha: i suppose a potential workaround would be to
tell users to set disable-modern= to match their vhost capabilities, but
it's hard for them to apply that retroactively if they're looking to migrate

Another thought: Maybe this bug only surfaced right now because older
qemus defaulted virtio-pci to legacy?

(I think modern virtio-pci with old vhost resulted in a config that was
rejected at least by Linux guests. Because pci defaulted to legacy, we
only had the post-plugged workaround for ccw before.)


Yes, for PCI with old vhost, modern enabled and recent kernel on guest,
we get this failure at virtio-pci probe time:

virtio_net virtio0: virtio: device uses modern interface but does not have
VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1.

Is this error a regression in QEMU 2.8?

I think it pokes up because modern virtio-pci is now by default on. It
was broken before if the user wanted a modern virtio-pci device
explicitly.

(ccw defaulted to virtio 1.0 much earlier, so we had the post-plugged
solution that this patch replaced and which is basically the same for
ccw.)


It's better to ship with an existing issue still open than with a new
regression.  We must not break existing users' setups.

A solution for the next QEMU version is to use a flag in the machine
type version telling virtio whether or not allow devices (e.g.
vhost-net) to influence the host feature bits.  Old machine types will
say no, new machine types will say yes.

In the meantime I would revert your patch for QEMU 2.8.

Maxime, Cornelia, Michael: Do you agree?

Stefan

Reverting the patch should be fine for ccw. What about the virtio-pci
with old vhost mess, though? Defaulting to modern would mean that users
get unusable devices in that setup.

Just did some tests, and can confirm that reverting the patch would
re-introduce initial bug, which is breaking virtio-pci when host does
not support VERSION_1.

Note that this problem is present in v2.7.0 since:

commit 9a4c0e220d8a4f82b5665d0ee95ef94d8e1509d5
Author: Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden>
Date:   Wed Jul 20 18:28:21 2016 +0300

    hw/virtio-pci: fix virtio behaviour

    Enable transitional virtio devices by default.
    Enable virtio-1.0 for devices plugged into
    PCIe ports (Root ports or Downstream ports).

    Using the virtio-1 mode will remove the limitation
    of the number of devices that can be attached to a machine
    by removing the need for the IO BAR.

    Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden>
    Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
    Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
    Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <address@hidden>


Maybe better to implement the workaround you proposed Stefan?

Thanks,
Maxime



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]