qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 1/1] crypto: add virtio-crypto driver


From: Gonglei (Arei)
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 1/1] crypto: add virtio-crypto driver
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 01:08:51 +0000




Regards,
-Gonglei


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zeng, Xin [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 8:59 AM
> To: Gonglei (Arei); Halil Pasic; address@hidden;
> address@hidden; address@hidden;
> address@hidden; address@hidden
> Cc: Huangweidong (C); Claudio Fontana; address@hidden; Luonengjun;
> Hanweidong (Randy); Xuquan (Quan Xu); Wanzongshun (Vincent);
> address@hidden; Zhoujian (jay, Euler); address@hidden;
> longpeng; address@hidden; address@hidden; Wubin (H);
> address@hidden
> Subject: RE: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 1/1] crypto: add virtio-crypto driver
> 
> On Thursday, December 15, 2016 8:45 AM, Gonglei (Arei) Wrote:
> < > > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_core.c
> < > b/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_core.c
> < > > new file mode 100644
> < > > index 0000000..c0854a1
> < > > --- /dev/null
> < > > +++ b/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_core.c
> < > > @@ -0,0 +1,474 @@
> < > [..]
> < > > +
> < > > +static void virtcrypto_dataq_callback(struct virtqueue *vq)
> < > > +{
> < > > +       struct virtio_crypto *vcrypto = vq->vdev->priv;
> < > > +       struct virtio_crypto_request *vc_req;
> < > > +       unsigned long flags;
> < > > +       unsigned int len;
> < > > +       struct ablkcipher_request *ablk_req;
> < > > +       int error;
> < > > +
> < > > +       spin_lock_irqsave(&vcrypto->lock, flags);
> < >
> < > Would it make sense to use a per virtqueue lock
> < > like in virtio_blk for example instead of locking on the whole
> < > device? OK, it seems you use only one dataqueue, so it
> < > may not be that relevant.
> < >
> < Currently yes, both the backend device (cryptodev-backend-builtin)
> < and the frontend driver use one dataqueue.
> <
> 
> I think it makes sense to use per virtqueue lock here though it only uses one
> queue so far,
> but in the spec we already have multi queues support.
> 
Yes, I agree. Will do that in V8 soon. 
Hope to catch up with Michael's pull request for 4.10.

Regards,
-Gonglei




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]