qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 03/17] qga/schema: improve guest-set-vcpus Re


From: Markus Armbruster
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 03/17] qga/schema: improve guest-set-vcpus Returns: section
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:13:30 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)

Marc-André Lureau <address@hidden> writes:

> Itemize the possible return values of guest-set-vcpus.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <address@hidden>
> ---
>  qga/qapi-schema.json | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/qga/qapi-schema.json b/qga/qapi-schema.json
> index 94c03128fd..ad63737fce 100644
> --- a/qga/qapi-schema.json
> +++ b/qga/qapi-schema.json
> @@ -697,21 +697,21 @@
>  # Returns: The length of the initial sublist that has been successfully
>  #          processed. The guest agent maximizes this value. Possible cases:
>  #
> -#          0:                if the @vcpus list was empty on input. Guest 
> state
> +#          - 0:              if the @vcpus list was empty on input. Guest 
> state
>  #                            has not been changed. Otherwise,
>  #
> -#          Error:            processing the first node of @vcpus failed for 
> the
> +#          - Error:          processing the first node of @vcpus failed for 
> the
>  #                            reason returned. Guest state has not been 
> changed.
>  #                            Otherwise,
>  #
> -#          < length(@vcpus): more than zero initial nodes have been 
> processed,
> +#          - < length(@vcpus): more than zero initial nodes have been 
> processed,
>  #                            but not the entire @vcpus list. Guest state has
>  #                            changed accordingly. To retrieve the error
>  #                            (assuming it persists), repeat the call with the
>  #                            successfully processed initial sublist removed.
>  #                            Otherwise,
>  #
> -#          length(@vcpus):   call successful.
> +#          - length(@vcpus): call successful.
>  #
>  # Since: 1.5
>  ##

I'm fine with this as is, therefore
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <address@hidden>

But do feel free to drop the blank lines for consistency with itemized
lists elsewhere.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]