Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/11] Stubs cleanup

[Peter Maydell]

On 22 December 2016 at 15:59, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
> This moves out of libqemustub.a those functions which can be handled
> simply by $(call lnot), like we already do for pci-stub.c or kvm-stub.c.
> libqemustub.a keep the more complex cases where a small part of the
> executables we build needs an implementation of a small subset of an API.

So why is doing it this way round better? (I don't have a strong
opinion here, but you don't really give a rationale for this change.)

thanks
-- PMM