qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] vl: Ensure the numa_post_machine_init func


From: Eduardo Habkost
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] vl: Ensure the numa_post_machine_init func in the appropriate location
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 18:09:13 -0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:42:31PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
> In the numa_post_machine_init(), we use CPU_FOREACH macro to set all
> CPUs' namu_node. So, we should make sure that we call it after Qemu
> has already initialied all the CPUs.
> 
> As we all know, the CPUs can be created by "-smp"(pc_new_cpu) or
> "-device"(qdev_device_add) command. But, before the device init,
> Qemu execute the numa_post_machine_init earlier. It makes the mapping
> of NUMA nodes and CPUs incorrect.
> 
> The patch move the numa_post_machine_init func in the appropriate
> location.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <address@hidden>

I would like to move cpu_index initialization to
qom/cpu.c:cpu_common_realizefn(), and remove
numa_post_machine_init() completely. But this fixes the bug while
we don't do that.

Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden>

Queued on numa-next. Thanks!

> ---
>  vl.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/vl.c b/vl.c
> index c643d3f..f38b0e2 100644
> --- a/vl.c
> +++ b/vl.c
> @@ -4549,8 +4549,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
>  
>      cpu_synchronize_all_post_init();
>  
> -    numa_post_machine_init();
> -
>      if (qemu_opts_foreach(qemu_find_opts("fw_cfg"),
>                            parse_fw_cfg, fw_cfg_find(), NULL) != 0) {
>          exit(1);
> @@ -4571,6 +4569,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
>                            device_init_func, NULL, NULL)) {
>          exit(1);
>      }
> +
> +    numa_post_machine_init();
> +
>      rom_reset_order_override();
>  
>      /* Did we create any drives that we failed to create a device for? */
> -- 
> 2.5.5
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Eduardo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]