qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] vl: Ensure the numa_post_machine_init func


From: Eduardo Habkost
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] vl: Ensure the numa_post_machine_init func in the appropriate location
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:45:21 -0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:02:35PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
> Hi, Eduardo
> 
> At 01/18/2017 04:09 AM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:42:31PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
> > > In the numa_post_machine_init(), we use CPU_FOREACH macro to set all
> > > CPUs' namu_node. So, we should make sure that we call it after Qemu
> > > has already initialied all the CPUs.
> > > 
> > > As we all know, the CPUs can be created by "-smp"(pc_new_cpu) or
> > > "-device"(qdev_device_add) command. But, before the device init,
> > > Qemu execute the numa_post_machine_init earlier. It makes the mapping
> > > of NUMA nodes and CPUs incorrect.
> > > 
> > > The patch move the numa_post_machine_init func in the appropriate
> > > location.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <address@hidden>
> > 
> > I would like to move cpu_index initialization to
> > qom/cpu.c:cpu_common_realizefn(), and remove
> > numa_post_machine_init() completely.
> 
> Thanks, it is a good idea. I will try it later.
> 
> But, I hope to know that:
> 
> If you may want to say the cpu->**numa_node** initialization?
> Because the **cpu_index** initialization is in pc_cpu_pre_plug()
> currently, like that: cs->cpu_index = idx;

Oops, I meant the numa_node initialization. :)

-- 
Eduardo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]