qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v11 4/4] vfio: add 'aer' property to expose


From: Alex Williamson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v11 4/4] vfio: add 'aer' property to expose aercap
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 11:01:01 -0700

On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:04:08 +0800
Cao jin <address@hidden> wrote:

> On 01/19/2017 06:36 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 17:13:08 +0800
> > Cao jin <address@hidden> wrote:
> >   
> >> From: Chen Fan <address@hidden>
> >>
> >> Add 'aer' property, let user choose whether expose the aer capability
> >> or not.  
> > 
> > But that's not what it does, it only controls the behavior in response
> > to non-fatal errors, the capability is exposed regardless.
> >   
> 
> This commit log is legacy, and defaults to off is a result of the
> configuration restriction & your previous discussion, right?
> 
> In current version, if 'aer' property is off, we just allocate the
> config space via pcie_add_capability(), we don't init the AER
> capability, the value is all 0s there, so does that still mean
> "capability is exposed regardless"?

The design has changed, we no longer require a matching host and guest
topology, we can more easily transparently enable non-fatal error
correction.  We need to reevaluate whether previous decisions are still
valid, we cannot blindly assume that a requirement for a previous
design still applies.  Thanks,

Alex
 
> >> Should disable aer feature by default, because only non-fatal
> >> error is supported now.   
> > 
> > Why does that mean it should be disabled by default?  What bad thing
> > happens if we enable this opportunistically?
> >   
> >> Signed-off-by: Chen Fan <address@hidden>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <address@hidden>
> >> Signed-off-by: Cao jin <address@hidden>
> >> ---
> >>  hw/vfio/pci.c | 2 ++
> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> >> index 9861f72..fc9db66 100644
> >> --- a/hw/vfio/pci.c
> >> +++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> >> @@ -3057,6 +3057,8 @@ static Property vfio_pci_dev_properties[] = {
> >>      DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("x-pci-sub-device-id", VFIOPCIDevice,
> >>                         sub_device_id, PCI_ANY_ID),
> >>      DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("x-igd-gms", VFIOPCIDevice, igd_gms, 0),
> >> +    DEFINE_PROP_BIT("aer", VFIOPCIDevice, features,
> >> +                    VFIO_FEATURE_ENABLE_AER_BIT, false),
> >>      /*
> >>       * TODO - support passed fds... is this necessary?
> >>       * DEFINE_PROP_STRING("vfiofd", VFIOPCIDevice, vfiofd_name),  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > .
> >   
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]