qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 03/14] replay: exception replay fix


From: Pavel Dovgalyuk
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 03/14] replay: exception replay fix
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 16:26:51 +0300

> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:address@hidden
> On 25/01/2017 13:27, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
> >> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:address@hidden
> >> On 25/01/2017 12:33, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
> >>>> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:address@hidden
> >>>> On 25/01/2017 12:12, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
> >>>>>> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:address@hidden
> >>>>>> On 24/01/2017 08:17, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
> >>>>>>> @@ -451,6 +451,10 @@ static inline bool cpu_handle_exception(CPUState 
> >>>>>>> *cpu, int *ret)
> >>>>>>>  #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> >>>>>>>      } else if (replay_has_exception()
> >>>>>>>                 && cpu->icount_decr.u16.low + cpu->icount_extra == 0) 
> >>>>>>> {
> >>>>>>> +        /* Break the execution loop in case of running out of TB 
> >>>>>>> cache.
> >>>>>>> +           This is needed to make flushing of the TB cache, because
> >>>>>>> +           real flush is queued to be executed outside the cpu loop. 
> >>>>>>> */
> >>>>>>> +        cpu->exception_index = EXCP_INTERRUPT;
> >>>>>>>          /* try to cause an exception pending in the log */
> >>>>>>>          cpu_exec_nocache(cpu, 1, tb_find(cpu, NULL, 0), true);
> >>>>>>>          *ret = -1;
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Why is replay_has_exception() related to be running out of TB cache?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It doesn't.
> >>>>> Calling tb_find when there is not space in cache causes tb_flush and 
> >>>>> cpu_loop_exit.
> >>>>> But execution loop will continue, because there is no reason to break it
> >>>>> (like setting exception_index).
> >>>>
> >>>> What about setting cpu->exit_request?  queue_work_on_cpu calls
> >>>> qemu_cpu_kick.
> >>>
> >>> cpu->exit_request does not checked in this loop.
> >>> We have to add this checking somewhere then?
> >>
> >> It's checked by cpu_handle_interrupt.  Are you not reaching
> >> cpu_handle_interrupt then?  Why?
> >
> > Execution doesn't reach cpu_handle_interrupt, because tb_find
> > calls cpu_loop_exit. And the execution loop enters cpu_handle_exception 
> > again and again.
> 
> Perhaps tb_gen_code should set cpu->exception_index before calling
> cpu_loop_exit.

Maybe it would be better, because tb_gen_code is called in many other paths.
I'll fix the patch.

Pavel Dovgalyuk




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]