qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 3/4] .shippable.yml: new CI provider


From: Alex Bennée
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 3/4] .shippable.yml: new CI provider
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 19:40:32 +0000
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 25.2.3

Fam Zheng <address@hidden> writes:

> On Thu, 02/16 12:34, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Ostensibly Shippable offers a similar set of services as Travis.
>> However they are focused on Docker container based work-flows so we
>> can use our existing containers to run a few extra builds - in this
>> case a bunch of cross-compiled targets on a Debian multiarch system.
>
> Out of curiosity, what are the forms of build report from shippable
> service?

It sends out emails and there is the web status page:

https://app.shippable.com/runs/58a596c4266ed80f003a9385/summary

There is also support for build badges a.la Travis.

>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <address@hidden>
>>
>> ---
>> v3
>>   - reduce matrix to armhf/arm64 which currently work
>>   - use the make docker-image-* build stanzas
>>   - add TARGET_LIST to each build
>> ---
>>  .shippable.yml | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 .shippable.yml
>>
>> diff --git a/.shippable.yml b/.shippable.yml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..4de8daf341
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/.shippable.yml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
>> +language: c
>> +env:
>> +  matrix:
>> +    - IMAGE=debian-armhf-cross
>> +      TARGET_LIST=arm-softmmu,arm-linux-user
>> +    - IMAGE=debian-arm64-cross
>> +      TARGET_LIST=aarch64-softmmu,aarch64-linux-user
>> +    - IMAGE=centos6
>> +      TARGET_LIST=i386-softmmu,x86_64-softmmu
>> +build:
>> +  pre_ci:
>> +    - make docker-image-${IMAGE}
>> +  pre_ci_boot:
>> +    image_name: qemu
>> +    image_tag: ${IMAGE}
>> +    pull: false
>> +    options: "-e HOME=/root"
>> +  ci:
>> +    - unset CC
>> +    - ./configure ${QEMU_CONFIGURE_OPTS} --target-list=${TARGET_LIST}
>> +    - make -j2
>
> It's a good surprise that our docker infrastructure fits in the shippable
> framework pretty nicely. :)
>
> Looks good to me without cross checking the shippable API:
>
> Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <address@hidden>


--
Alex Bennée



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]