qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 4/8] ACPI: Add Virtual Machine Generation ID


From: Igor Mammedov
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 4/8] ACPI: Add Virtual Machine Generation ID support
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 15:40:50 +0100

On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:28:11 +0100
Laszlo Ersek <address@hidden> wrote:

> On 02/20/17 14:13, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 12:38:06 +0100
> > Laszlo Ersek <address@hidden> wrote:
[...]
> >> Interesting! I hope Igor can double-check this!  
> > I've retested v7, and it reliably fails (vmgenid_wait doesn't see change)
> > then I tested v8(qemu) + (seabios v5/v4) with the same steps as before
> > and it appears to work as expected, i.e. vmgenid_wait reports GUID
> > change after executing 'continue' monitor command so something
> > has been fixed in v8.  
> 
> Yes, I know what. Please see item (2) in this reply of mine, for v7 1/8:
> 
> msgid: <address@hidden>
> URL: https://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg430440.html
> 
> With that copy/paste bug in the code, the "src_offset" field of
> WRITE_POINTER was not populated correctly. The BIOS would carry that out
> faithfully, of course, but then later QEMU would write the fresh GUID to
> an incorrect offset in the guest firmware allocated area -- the offset
> wouldn't match the AML code (ADDR method), so the guest OS wouldn't see
> the change.
> 
> 
> If you scroll to the end of my message linked above, I wrote -- again,
> for v7 --:
> 
>     I also tested this series (with the assignment under (2) fixed up,
>     of course), as documented earlier in
> <https://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg430075.html>
>     (msgid  <address@hidden>).
> 
>     Hence, with (1) and (2) fixed, you can also add
> 
>     Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <address@hidden>
> 
> In other words, my positive testing for v7 was conditional on my *local*
> (but reported, suggested) fix for bug (2) in v7 1/8. And that issue has
> been fixed in v8.
> 
> ... So, I guess we're all OK now. Can you confirm please?
Confirmed

> 
> Thanks!
> Laszlo
[...]




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]