qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 05/11] target/ppc: update ca32 in arithmetic


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 05/11] target/ppc: update ca32 in arithmetic substract
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 21:36:16 +1100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0

On 02/22/2017 08:29 PM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <address@hidden>
---
 target/ppc/translate.c | 12 +++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/target/ppc/translate.c b/target/ppc/translate.c
index b589d09..184d10f 100644
--- a/target/ppc/translate.c
+++ b/target/ppc/translate.c
@@ -827,7 +827,15 @@ static inline void gen_op_arith_compute_ca32(DisasContext 
*ctx,
     }

     t0 = tcg_temp_new();
-    tcg_gen_xor_tl(t0, arg0, arg1);
+    if (!add_ca && sub) {

I think checking add_ca is wrong.  And note that it is otherwise unused.

+        /* Invert arg0 before xor as in the !add_ca case,
+         * we do not get inverse of arg0
+         */
+        tcg_gen_not_tl(t0, arg0);
+        tcg_gen_xor_tl(t0, t0, arg1);
+    } else {
+        tcg_gen_xor_tl(t0, arg0, arg1);
+    }
     tcg_gen_xor_tl(t0, t0, res);
     tcg_gen_extract_tl(cpu_ca32, t0, 32, 1);
     tcg_temp_free(t0);
@@ -1382,11 +1390,13 @@ static inline void gen_op_arith_subf(DisasContext *ctx, 
TCGv ret, TCGv arg1,
             zero = tcg_const_tl(0);
             tcg_gen_add2_tl(t0, cpu_ca, arg2, zero, cpu_ca, zero);
             tcg_gen_add2_tl(t0, cpu_ca, t0, cpu_ca, inv1, zero);
+            gen_op_arith_compute_ca32(ctx, t0, inv1, arg2, add_ca, 1);

The last parameter here should be 0.

             tcg_temp_free(zero);
             tcg_temp_free(inv1);
         } else {
             tcg_gen_setcond_tl(TCG_COND_GEU, cpu_ca, arg2, arg1);
             tcg_gen_sub_tl(t0, arg2, arg1);
+            gen_op_arith_compute_ca32(ctx, t0, arg1, arg2, add_ca, 1);
         }
     } else if (add_ca) {
         /* Since we're ignoring carry-out, we can simplify the


r~



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]