qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] mttcg/i386: Patch instruction using async_safe_


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] mttcg/i386: Patch instruction using async_safe_* framework
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:38:23 +1100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0

On 02/23/2017 12:20 PM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
In mttcg, calling pause_all_vcpus() during execution from the
generated TBs causes a deadlock if some vCPU is waiting for exclusive
execution in start_exclusive(). Fix this by using the aync_safe_*
framework instead of pausing vcpus for patching instructions.

CC: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
CC: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
CC: Alex Bennée <address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <address@hidden>
---
 hw/i386/kvmvapic.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c b/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c
index 82a4955..15eb39d 100644
--- a/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c
+++ b/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c
@@ -383,8 +383,7 @@ static void patch_byte(X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong addr, 
uint8_t byte)
     cpu_memory_rw_debug(CPU(cpu), addr, &byte, 1, 1);
 }

-static void patch_call(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip,
-                       uint32_t target)
+static void patch_call(X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip, uint32_t target)
 {
     uint32_t offset;

@@ -393,17 +392,74 @@ static void patch_call(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, 
target_ulong ip,
     cpu_memory_rw_debug(CPU(cpu), ip + 1, (void *)&offset, sizeof(offset), 1);
 }

-static void patch_instruction(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip)
+struct PatchInfo {
+    VAPICHandlers *handler;
+    target_ulong ip;
+};
+
+static void do_patch_instruction(CPUState *cs, run_on_cpu_data data)
 {
-    CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
-    CPUX86State *env = &cpu->env;
-    VAPICHandlers *handlers;
+    X86CPU *x86_cpu = X86_CPU(cs);
+    CPUX86State *env = &x86_cpu->env;
+    struct PatchInfo *info = (struct PatchInfo *) data.host_ptr;
+    VAPICHandlers *handlers = info->handler;
+    target_ulong ip = info->ip;
     uint8_t opcode[2];
     uint32_t imm32 = 0;
     target_ulong current_pc = 0;
     target_ulong current_cs_base = 0;
     uint32_t current_flags = 0;

+    cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(env, &current_pc, &current_cs_base,
+                         &current_flags);
+    /* Account this instruction, because we will exit the tb.
+       This is the first instruction in the block. Therefore
+       there is no need in restoring CPU state. */
+    if (use_icount) {
+        --cs->icount_decr.u16.low;
+    }
+
+    cpu_memory_rw_debug(cs, ip, opcode, sizeof(opcode), 0);
+
+    switch (opcode[0]) {
+    case 0x89: /* mov r32 to r/m32 */
+        patch_byte(x86_cpu, ip, 0x50 + modrm_reg(opcode[1]));  /* push reg */
+        patch_call(x86_cpu, ip + 1, handlers->set_tpr);
+        break;
+    case 0x8b: /* mov r/m32 to r32 */
+        patch_byte(x86_cpu, ip, 0x90);
+        patch_call(x86_cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr[modrm_reg(opcode[1])]);
+        break;
+    case 0xa1: /* mov abs to eax */
+        patch_call(x86_cpu, ip, handlers->get_tpr[0]);
+        break;
+    case 0xa3: /* mov eax to abs */
+        patch_call(x86_cpu, ip, handlers->set_tpr_eax);
+        break;
+    case 0xc7: /* mov imm32, r/m32 (c7/0) */
+        patch_byte(x86_cpu, ip, 0x68);  /* push imm32 */
+        cpu_memory_rw_debug(cs, ip + 6, (void *)&imm32, sizeof(imm32), 0);
+        cpu_memory_rw_debug(cs, ip + 1, (void *)&imm32, sizeof(imm32), 1);
+        patch_call(x86_cpu, ip + 5, handlers->set_tpr);
+        break;
+    case 0xff: /* push r/m32 */
+        patch_byte(x86_cpu, ip, 0x50); /* push eax */
+        patch_call(x86_cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr_stack);
+        break;
+    default:
+        abort();
+    }
+
+    g_free(info);
+}
+
+static void patch_instruction(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU *cpu, target_ulong ip)
+{
+    CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
+    VAPICHandlers *handlers;
+    uint8_t opcode[2];
+    uint32_t imm32 = 0;
+
     if (smp_cpus == 1) {
         handlers = &s->rom_state.up;
     } else {
@@ -411,14 +467,14 @@ static void patch_instruction(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU 
*cpu, target_ulong ip)
     }

     if (!kvm_enabled()) {
-        cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(env, &current_pc, &current_cs_base,
-                             &current_flags);
-        /* Account this instruction, because we will exit the tb.
-           This is the first instruction in the block. Therefore
-           there is no need in restoring CPU state. */
-        if (use_icount) {
-            --cs->icount_decr.u16.low;
-        }
+        struct PatchInfo *info = g_new(struct PatchInfo, 1);
+        const run_on_cpu_func fn = do_patch_instruction;
+        info->handler = handlers;
+        info->ip = ip;
+
+        async_safe_run_on_cpu(cs, fn, RUN_ON_CPU_HOST_PTR(info));
+        cs->exception_index = EXCP_INTERRUPT;
+        cpu_loop_exit(cs);
     }

     pause_all_vcpus();
@@ -428,41 +484,33 @@ static void patch_instruction(VAPICROMState *s, X86CPU 
*cpu, target_ulong ip)
     switch (opcode[0]) {
     case 0x89: /* mov r32 to r/m32 */
         patch_byte(cpu, ip, 0x50 + modrm_reg(opcode[1]));  /* push reg */
-        patch_call(s, cpu, ip + 1, handlers->set_tpr);
+        patch_call(cpu, ip + 1, handlers->set_tpr);
         break;
     case 0x8b: /* mov r/m32 to r32 */
         patch_byte(cpu, ip, 0x90);
-        patch_call(s, cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr[modrm_reg(opcode[1])]);
+        patch_call(cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr[modrm_reg(opcode[1])]);
         break;
     case 0xa1: /* mov abs to eax */
-        patch_call(s, cpu, ip, handlers->get_tpr[0]);
+        patch_call(cpu, ip, handlers->get_tpr[0]);
         break;
     case 0xa3: /* mov eax to abs */
-        patch_call(s, cpu, ip, handlers->set_tpr_eax);
+        patch_call(cpu, ip, handlers->set_tpr_eax);
         break;
     case 0xc7: /* mov imm32, r/m32 (c7/0) */
         patch_byte(cpu, ip, 0x68);  /* push imm32 */
         cpu_memory_rw_debug(cs, ip + 6, (void *)&imm32, sizeof(imm32), 0);
         cpu_memory_rw_debug(cs, ip + 1, (void *)&imm32, sizeof(imm32), 1);
-        patch_call(s, cpu, ip + 5, handlers->set_tpr);
+        patch_call(cpu, ip + 5, handlers->set_tpr);
         break;
     case 0xff: /* push r/m32 */
         patch_byte(cpu, ip, 0x50); /* push eax */
-        patch_call(s, cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr_stack);
+        patch_call(cpu, ip + 1, handlers->get_tpr_stack);
         break;
     default:
         abort();
     }

It appears as if we wind up with two copies of this patching code.
Please rearrange your new do_patch_instruction so that's not necessary.


r~



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]