[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] linux-user: fill target sigcontext s
From: |
Laurent Vivier |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] linux-user: fill target sigcontext struct accordingly |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Feb 2017 11:22:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 |
Le 28/02/2017 à 02:09, David Gibson a écrit :
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 09:43:57PM +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Le 31/01/2017 à 23:05, Jose Ricardo Ziviani a écrit :
>>> A segfault is noticed when an emulated program uses any of ucontext
>>> regs fields. Risu detected this issue in the following operation when
>>> handling a signal:
>>> ucontext_t *uc = (ucontext_t*)uc;
>>> uc->uc_mcontext.regs->nip += 4;
>>>
>>> but this works fine:
>>> uc->uc_mcontext.gp_regs[PT_NIP] += 4;
>>>
>>> This patch set regs to a valid location as well as other sigcontext
>>> fields.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jose Ricardo Ziviani <address@hidden>
>>> ---
>>> linux-user/signal.c | 5 +++++
>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/linux-user/signal.c b/linux-user/signal.c
>>> index 5064de0..8209539 100644
>>> --- a/linux-user/signal.c
>>> +++ b/linux-user/signal.c
>>> @@ -5155,6 +5155,7 @@ static void setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct
>>> target_sigaction *ka,
>>> target_ulong rt_sf_addr, newsp = 0;
>>> int i, err = 0;
>>> #if defined(TARGET_PPC64)
>>> + struct target_sigcontext *sc = 0;
>>> struct image_info *image = ((TaskState *)thread_cpu->opaque)->info;
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> @@ -5183,6 +5184,10 @@ static void setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct
>>> target_sigaction *ka,
>>> #if defined(TARGET_PPC64)
>>> mctx = &rt_sf->uc.tuc_sigcontext.mcontext;
>>> trampptr = &rt_sf->trampoline[0];
>>> +
>>> + sc = &rt_sf->uc.tuc_sigcontext;
>>> + __put_user(h2g(mctx), &sc->regs);
>>> + __put_user(sig, &sc->signal);
>>> #else
>>> mctx = &rt_sf->uc.tuc_mcontext;
>>> trampptr = (uint32_t *)&rt_sf->uc.tuc_mcontext.tramp;
>>>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <address@hidden>
>>
>> This is correct, but QEMU and kernel implementation are really
>> different.
>
Hi David,
> Laurent, I'm a bit clear on what the upshot is here.
>
> Should I merge the patch above?
I've already included this patch in a linux-user pull request a couple
of weeks ago, and it is now in the master.
So you have nothing to do :)
Thanks,
Laurent
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature