qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] hw/timer/exynos4210_mct: Fix checkpatch sty


From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] hw/timer/exynos4210_mct: Fix checkpatch style errors
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 18:48:48 +0200

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:44 PM, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 1 March 2017 at 18:26, Krzysztof Kozlowski <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Fix checkpatch errors:
>> 1. ERROR: spaces required around that '+' (ctx:VxV)
>> 2. ERROR: spaces required around that '&' (ctx:VxV)
>>
>> No functional changes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  hw/timer/exynos4210_mct.c | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/timer/exynos4210_mct.c b/hw/timer/exynos4210_mct.c
>> index 76634fb1b4fd..4dd3e441e2e6 100644
>> --- a/hw/timer/exynos4210_mct.c
>> +++ b/hw/timer/exynos4210_mct.c
>> @@ -936,7 +936,7 @@ static void 
>> exynos4210_mct_update_freq(Exynos4210MCTState *s)
>>  {
>>      uint32_t freq = s->freq;
>>      s->freq = 24000000 /
>> -            ((MCT_CFG_GET_PRESCALER(s->reg_mct_cfg)+1) *
>> +            ((MCT_CFG_GET_PRESCALER(s->reg_mct_cfg) + 1) *
>>                      MCT_CFG_GET_DIVIDER(s->reg_mct_cfg));
>>
>>      if (freq != s->freq) {
>> @@ -1160,7 +1160,7 @@ static void exynos4210_mct_write(void *opaque, hwaddr 
>> offset,
>>
>>          DPRINTF("comparator %d write 0x%llx val << %d\n", index, value, 
>> shift);
>>
>> -        if (offset&0x4) {
>> +        if (offset & 0x4) {
>>              s->g_timer.reg.wstat |= G_WSTAT_COMP_U(index);
>>          } else {
>>              s->g_timer.reg.wstat |= G_WSTAT_COMP_L(index);
>
> PS: you can shut the patchew robot up if you want by squashing this
> patch into patch 3, since one line is being changed in that patch
> anyway and an extra line in what's a "fix whitespace" patch
> anyway is no big deal. Or you can leave it the way you have
> it now; I don't mind.

Yes, I saw the warning. I could also sent them in reversed order. As
of squashing commits I think it is useful to have them separate
because change of indentation creates a difficult to read diff. Such
diff can sneak by other changes and it would not be spotted.

Best regards,
Krzysztof



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]