qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Benchmarking linux-user performance


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Benchmarking linux-user performance
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:48:31 +0100

On 10 March 2017 at 12:45, Dr. David Alan Gilbert <address@hidden> wrote:
> * Emilio G. Cota (address@hidden) wrote:
>>                      x86_64 NBench Floating Point Performance
>>                   Host: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 0 @ 2.90GHz
>>
>>   1.88 +-+-+---+--+---+---+---+--+---+---+---+---+--+---+---+---+--+---+-+-+
>>        |   +   +  +  *A*#*A*  +  +   +   +   +   +  +   +   +   +  +   +   |
>>   1.86 +-+           *** ***                                             +-+
>>        |            #       #   *A*#***                                    |
>>        |      *A*# #         # ##   *A*                                    |
>>   1.84 +-+    #  *A*         *A*      #                                  +-+
>>        |      #                        #                              *A*  |
>>   1.82 +-+   #                          #                            ##  +-+
>>        |     #                          *A*#                        #      |
>>    1.8 +-+  #                               #  #*A*               *A*    +-+
>>        |    #                               *A*   #                #       |
>>   1.78 +-+*A*                                      #       *A*    #      +-+
>>        |                                           #   ***#  #    #        |
>>        |                                           *A*#*A*    #  #         |
>>   1.76 +-+                                         ***         # #       +-+
>>        |   +   +  +   +   +   +  +   +   +   +   +  +   +   +  *A* +   +   |
>>   1.74 +-+-+---+--+---+---+---+--+---+---+---+---+--+---+---+---+--+---+-+-+
>>          v1.v1.v1.2v1.3v1.4v1.v1.6v1.7v2.0v2.1v2.v2.3v2.4v2.5v2.v2.7v2.8.0
>>                                    QEMU version
>
> I'm assuming the dips are where QEMU fixed something and cared about corner
> cases/accuracy?

Given the scale on the LHS is from 1.74 to 1.88 my guess is that the
variation is in large part noise and the major thing is "our fp
performance is bounded by softfloat, which doesn't change and is
always very slow".

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]