|
From: | Pradeep Jagadeesh |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v0] fsdev: QMP interface for throttling |
Date: | Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:25:31 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 |
On 3/20/2017 2:17 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 09:07:20AM -0400, Pradeep Jagadeesh wrote:diff --git a/hmp-commands.hx b/hmp-commands.hx index 8819281..e4e3478 100644 --- a/hmp-commands.hx +++ b/hmp-commands.hx @@ -1637,6 +1637,34 @@ ETEXI }, STEXI address@hidden 9p_passwd @var{device} @var{password} address@hidden 9p_passwd +Set the encrypted device @var{device} password to @var{password} +ETEXI + + { + .name = "fs9p_set_io_throttle", + .args_type = "device:B,bps:l,bps_rd:l,bps_wr:l,iops:l,iops_rd:l,iops_wr:l", + .params = "device bps bps_rd bps_wr iops iops_rd iops_wr", + .help = "change I/O throttle limits for a block drive", + .cmd = hmp_9pfs_set_io_throttle, + }, + +STEXI address@hidden fs9p_set_io_throttle @var{device} @var{bps} @var{bps_rd} @var{bps_wr} @var{iops} @var{iops_rd} @var{iops_wr} address@hidden 9pfs_set_io_throttle +Change I/O throttle limits for a block drive to @var{bps} @var{bps_rd} @var{bps_wr} @var{iops} @var{iops_rd} @var{iops_wr} +ETEXI + + { + .name = "set_password", + .args_type = "protocol:s,password:s,connected:s?", + .params = "protocol password action-if-connected", + .help = "set spice/vnc password", + .cmd = hmp_set_password, + }, + +STEXIThis looks all mangled wrt password related stuff
I did not understand the usage of the password. Do we really need password here?. I just followed how is it done in block devices.
diff --git a/qapi/9pfs.json b/qapi/9pfs.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c068474 --- /dev/null +++ b/qapi/9pfs.json @@ -0,0 +1,169 @@ +# -*- Mode: Python -*- + +## +# == QAPI 9p definitions +## + +# QAPI common definitions +{ 'include': 'common.json' } + +## +# @fs9p_set_io_throttle: +# +# Change I/O limits for a 9p/fsdev device. +# +# Since QEMU 2.9, I/0 limits can be enabled on each fsdev(9pfs) deviceIs this supposed to be generic for any fsdev impl, or specific to the 9p impl only ? Without knowing more, I'd expect us to really be designing something generic, and not tied to just the 9p impl. IOW, having '9p' in the name of the QAPI commands feels wrong - use of 'fsdev' feels like the better naming. Same applies to the HMP commands.
Yes its for the fsdev. But other than 9p when the fsdev is used? I will rename 9p to fsdev. Regards, Pradeep
Regards, Daniel
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |