qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] test-qobject-input-visitor: Cover visit_type_ui


From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] test-qobject-input-visitor: Cover visit_type_uint64()
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:11:00 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0

On 03/21/2017 12:44 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> The new test demonstrates known bugs: integers between INT64_MAX+1 and
> UINT64_MAX rejected, and integers between INT64_MIN and -1 are
> accepted modulo 2^64.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <address@hidden>
> ---
>  tests/test-qobject-input-visitor.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/test-qobject-input-visitor.c 
> b/tests/test-qobject-input-visitor.c
> index 6eb48fe..f965743 100644
> --- a/tests/test-qobject-input-visitor.c
> +++ b/tests/test-qobject-input-visitor.c
> @@ -116,6 +116,34 @@ static void test_visitor_in_int(TestInputVisitorData 
> *data,
>      g_assert_cmpint(res, ==, value);
>  }
>  
> +static void test_visitor_in_uint(TestInputVisitorData *data,
> +                                const void *unused)
> +{
> +    Error *err = NULL;
> +    uint64_t res = 0;
> +    int value = 42;
> +    Visitor *v;
> +
> +    v = visitor_input_test_init(data, "%d", value);

Another place where I have to rebase my work that gets rid of the
dynamic JSON parser, if we want to revive that patch series; but don't
let it stop you on this patch.

> +
> +    visit_type_uint64(v, NULL, &res, &error_abort);
> +    g_assert_cmpuint(res, ==, (uint64_t)value);
> +
> +    /* BUG: value between INT64_MIN and -1 accepted modulo 2^64 */
> +
> +    v = visitor_input_test_init(data, "%d", -value);

Not necessarily a bug - libvirt exploits this behavior.  So even if we
fix the real bug, namely...

> +
> +    visit_type_uint64(v, NULL, &res, &error_abort);
> +    g_assert_cmpuint(res, ==, (uint64_t)-value);
> +
> +    /* BUG: value between INT64_MAX+1 and UINT64_MAX rejected */
> +
> +    v = visitor_input_test_init(data, "18446744073709551574");

...this, we may be stuck keeping the modulo 2^64 parsing around for
back-compat.

At any rate, your test is a welcome addition; and as it only touches the
testsuite, it is still 2.9 material if desired.
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]