qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] block: pause block jobs for bdrv_drain_b


From: Jeff Cody
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] block: pause block jobs for bdrv_drain_begin/end
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:16:38 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:05:26PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> 
> 
> On 03/22/2017 12:01 PM, Jeff Cody wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:37:15AM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> >> ping, is this the only issue? Any feedback? If this can hit 2.9 that
> >> would be good.
> >>
> > 
> > The series looks fine to me, and I can patch up the nit from patchew when
> > applying.  But do you happen to have a qemu-iotest for this case, or is it
> > not very feasible to create one?
> > 
> 
> I might need a hint from Paolo on how; my reproducer ATM is to literally
> boot a Fedora VM and issue reboots/QMP commands and manually observe a
> hang. (Which is pretty subjective ...)
> 
> An iotest version would probably involve using the qtest socket to issue
> a PCI reset of some sort inbetween QMP commands as necessary, but
> testing for a hang in iotests seems race-prone. I have no idea how long
> this hang would last on other machines, for instance.
> 
> There might be a more fool-proof automated testing method, but at the
> second I'm drawing a blank.
>

OK, I figured as much.  We'll chalk that up as "not very feasible", at least
for the moment :)


> >>
> >> On 03/16/2017 05:28 PM, address@hidden wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
> >>> more information:
> >>>
> >>> Type: series
> >>> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] block: pause block jobs for 
> >>> bdrv_drain_begin/end
> >>> Message-id: address@hidden
> >>>
> >>> === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
> >>> #!/bin/bash
> >>>
> >>> BASE=base
> >>> n=1
> >>> total=$(git log --oneline $BASE.. | wc -l)
> >>> failed=0
> >>>
> >>> # Useful git options
> >>> git config --local diff.renamelimit 0
> >>> git config --local diff.renames True
> >>>
> >>> commits="$(git log --format=%H --reverse $BASE..)"
> >>> for c in $commits; do
> >>>     echo "Checking PATCH $n/$total: $(git log -n 1 --format=%s $c)..."
> >>>     if ! git show $c --format=email | ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --mailback 
> >>> -; then
> >>>         failed=1
> >>>         echo
> >>>     fi
> >>>     n=$((n+1))
> >>> done
> >>>
> >>> exit $failed
> >>> === TEST SCRIPT END ===
> >>>
> >>> Updating 3c8cf5a9c21ff8782164d1def7f44bd888713384
> >>> From https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu
> >>>  * [new tag]         patchew/address@hidden -> patchew/address@hidden
> >>> Switched to a new branch 'test'
> >>> 1cca6f3 blockjob: add devops to blockjob backends
> >>> 864d906 block-backend: add drained_begin / drained_end ops
> >>> 5e4f22d blockjob: add block_job_start_shim
> >>>
> >>> === OUTPUT BEGIN ===
> >>> Checking PATCH 1/3: blockjob: add block_job_start_shim...
> >>> Checking PATCH 2/3: block-backend: add drained_begin / drained_end ops...
> >>> ERROR: suspect code indent for conditional statements (8, 14)
> >>> #70: FILE: block/block-backend.c:1903:
> >>> +        if (blk->dev_ops && blk->dev_ops->drained_end) {
> >>> +              blk->dev_ops->drained_end(blk->dev_opaque);
> >>>
> >>> total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 67 lines checked
> >>>
> >>> Your patch has style problems, please review.  If any of these errors
> >>> are false positives report them to the maintainer, see
> >>> CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
> >>>
> >>> Checking PATCH 3/3: blockjob: add devops to blockjob backends...
> >>> === OUTPUT END ===
> >>>
> >>> Test command exited with code: 1
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>> Email generated automatically by Patchew [http://patchew.org/].
> >>> Please send your feedback to address@hidden
> >>>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]