qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] ui/console: ensure graphic updates don't ra


From: Alex Bennée
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] ui/console: ensure graphic updates don't race with TCG vCPUs
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:28:47 +0000
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 25.2.10

Laurent Desnogues <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi Alex,
>
> this patch breaks:
>
>   http://wiki.qemu.org/download/arm-test-0.2.tar.gz
>
> qemu-system-arm -kernel zImage.integrator -initrd arm_root.img
> -append "console=ttyAMA0" -machine integratorcp -serial stdio -icount
> 0
> Uncompressing 
> Linux..........................................................................
> done, booting the kernel.
> qemu-system-arm: /work/qemu/qemu/memory.c:920:
> memory_region_transaction_commit: Assertion
> `qemu_mutex_iothread_locked()' failed.

Doh - too many levels of BQL. So wi->exclusive tasks drop the iothread
so they don't deadlock as any other threads try and wake up and get to
cpu_exec_end. Of course the update was originally under BQL so the
deferred work should be as well. We have to make a minor tweak to avoid
triggering RCU clean-up outside the execution context though. Try this:

ui/console: ensure do_safe_dpy_refresh holds BQL

I missed the fact that when an exclusive work item runs it drops the
BQL to ensure all no vCPUs are stuck waiting for it, hence causing a
deadlock. However the actual helper needs to take the BQL especially
as we'll be messing with device emulation bits during the update which
all assume BQL is held.

We make a minor cpu_reloading_memory_map which must try and unlock the
RCU if we are actually outside the running context.

Reported-by: Laurent Desnogues <address@hidden>
CC: Gerd Hoffmann <address@hidden>
CC: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <address@hidden>

2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
cpu-exec-common.c | 2 +-
ui/console.c      | 2 ++

modified   cpu-exec-common.c
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ void cpu_loop_exit_noexc(CPUState *cpu)
 #if defined(CONFIG_SOFTMMU)
 void cpu_reloading_memory_map(void)
 {
-    if (qemu_in_vcpu_thread()) {
+    if (qemu_in_vcpu_thread() && current_cpu->running) {
         /* The guest can in theory prolong the RCU critical section as long
          * as it feels like. The major problem with this is that because it
          * can do multiple reconfigurations of the memory map within the
modified   ui/console.c
@@ -1586,7 +1586,9 @@ bool dpy_gfx_check_format(QemuConsole *con,
 static void do_safe_dpy_refresh(CPUState *cpu, run_on_cpu_data opaque)
 {
     DisplayChangeListener *dcl = opaque.host_ptr;
+    qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
     dcl->ops->dpy_refresh(dcl);
+    qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
 }

 static void dpy_refresh(DisplayState *s)



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]