qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9] qom: Fix regression with 'qom-type'


From: Markus Armbruster
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9] qom: Fix regression with 'qom-type'
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:24:00 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux)

Eric Blake <address@hidden> writes:

> Commit 9a6d1ac assumed that 'qom-type' could be removed from QemuOpts
> with no ill effects.  However, this command line proves otherwise:
>
> $ ./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -nodefaults -nographic -qmp stdio \
>   -object rng-random,filename=/dev/urandom,id=rng0 \
>   -device virtio-rng-pci,rng=rng0
> qemu-system-x86_64: -object rng-random,filename=/dev/urandom,id=rng0: 
> Parameter 'qom-type' is missing

Shows that our test coverage is still inadequate.  Also shows that I
should do more manual testing myself.  Sorry for the inconvenience!

> Fix the regression by restoring qom-type in opts after its temporary
> removal that was needed for the duration of user_creatable_add_opts().
>
> Reported-by: Richard W. M. Jones <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>
> ---
>  qom/object_interfaces.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/qom/object_interfaces.c b/qom/object_interfaces.c
> index 9c271ad..d4253a8 100644
> --- a/qom/object_interfaces.c
> +++ b/qom/object_interfaces.c
> @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ Object *user_creatable_add_opts(QemuOpts *opts, Error 
> **errp)
>      }
>      if (!id) {
>          error_setg(errp, QERR_MISSING_PARAMETER, "id");
> +        qemu_opt_set(opts, "qom-type", type, &error_abort);
>          g_free(type);
>          return NULL;
>      }
> @@ -134,6 +135,7 @@ Object *user_creatable_add_opts(QemuOpts *opts, Error 
> **errp)
>      visit_free(v);
>
>      qemu_opts_set_id(opts, (char *) id);
> +    qemu_opt_set(opts, "qom-type", type, &error_abort);
>      g_free(type);
>      QDECREF(pdict);
>      return obj;

The awkwardness increases a bit more, but I don't have better ideas.

Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <address@hidden>

Peter, can you apply this as a build fix?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]