Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6] vfio error recovery: kernel support

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 04:54:33PM +0800, Cao jin wrote:
> Apparently, I don't have experience to induce non-fatal error, device
> error is more of a chance related with the environment(temperature,
> humidity, etc) as I understand.

I'm not sure how to interpret this statement. I think what Alex is
saying is simply that patches should include some justification. They
make changes but what are they improving?
For example:

        I tested device ABC in conditions DEF. Without a patch VM
        stops. With the patches applied VM recovers and proceeds to
        use the device normally.

is one reasonable justification imho.

-- 
MST