[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RESEND V3 5/6] migration: calculate downtime on
From: |
Peter Xu |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RESEND V3 5/6] migration: calculate downtime on dst side |
Date: |
Mon, 8 May 2017 14:29:06 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 02:11:19PM +0300, Alexey Perevalov wrote:
> On 04/28/2017 01:00 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 09:57:37AM +0300, Alexey Perevalov wrote:
> >>This patch provides downtime calculation per vCPU,
> >>as a summary and as a overlapped value for all vCPUs.
> >>
> >>This approach was suggested by Peter Xu, as an improvements of
> >>previous approch where QEMU kept tree with faulted page address and cpus
> >>bitmask
> >>in it. Now QEMU is keeping array with faulted page address as value and vCPU
> >>as index. It helps to find proper vCPU at UFFD_COPY time. Also it keeps
> >>list for downtime per vCPU (could be traced with page_fault_addr)
> >>
> >>For more details see comments for get_postcopy_total_downtime
> >>implementation.
> >>
> >>Downtime will not calculated if postcopy_downtime field of
> >>MigrationIncomingState wasn't initialized.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Alexey Perevalov <address@hidden>
> >>---
> >> include/migration/migration.h | 3 ++
> >> migration/migration.c | 103
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> migration/postcopy-ram.c | 20 +++++++-
> >> migration/trace-events | 6 ++-
> >> 4 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/include/migration/migration.h b/include/migration/migration.h
> >>index e8fb68f..a22f9ce 100644
> >>--- a/include/migration/migration.h
> >>+++ b/include/migration/migration.h
> >>@@ -139,6 +139,9 @@ void migration_incoming_state_destroy(void);
> >> * Functions to work with downtime context
> >> */
> >> struct DowntimeContext *downtime_context_new(void);
> >>+void mark_postcopy_downtime_begin(uint64_t addr, int cpu);
> >>+void mark_postcopy_downtime_end(uint64_t addr);
> >>+uint64_t get_postcopy_total_downtime(void);
> >> struct MigrationState
> >> {
> >>diff --git a/migration/migration.c b/migration/migration.c
> >>index ec76e5c..2c6f150 100644
> >>--- a/migration/migration.c
> >>+++ b/migration/migration.c
> >>@@ -2150,3 +2150,106 @@ PostcopyState postcopy_state_set(PostcopyState
> >>new_state)
> >> return atomic_xchg(&incoming_postcopy_state, new_state);
> >> }
> >>+void mark_postcopy_downtime_begin(uint64_t addr, int cpu)
> >>+{
> >>+ MigrationIncomingState *mis = migration_incoming_get_current();
> >>+ DowntimeContext *dc;
> >>+ if (!mis->downtime_ctx || cpu < 0) {
> >>+ return;
> >>+ }
> >>+ dc = mis->downtime_ctx;
> >>+ dc->vcpu_addr[cpu] = addr;
> >>+ dc->last_begin = dc->page_fault_vcpu_time[cpu] =
> >>+ qemu_clock_get_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_REALTIME);
> >>+
> >>+ trace_mark_postcopy_downtime_begin(addr, dc,
> >>dc->page_fault_vcpu_time[cpu],
> >>+ cpu);
> >>+}
> >>+
> >>+void mark_postcopy_downtime_end(uint64_t addr)
> >>+{
> >>+ MigrationIncomingState *mis = migration_incoming_get_current();
> >>+ DowntimeContext *dc;
> >>+ int i;
> >>+ bool all_vcpu_down = true;
> >>+ int64_t now;
> >>+
> >>+ if (!mis->downtime_ctx) {
> >>+ return;
> >>+ }
> >>+ dc = mis->downtime_ctx;
> >>+ now = qemu_clock_get_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_REALTIME);
> >>+
> >>+ /* check all vCPU down,
> >>+ * QEMU has bitmap.h, but even with bitmap_and
> >>+ * will be a cycle */
> >>+ for (i = 0; i < smp_cpus; i++) {
> >>+ if (dc->vcpu_addr[i]) {
> >>+ continue;
> >>+ }
> >>+ all_vcpu_down = false;
> >>+ break;
> >>+ }
> >>+
> >>+ if (all_vcpu_down) {
> >>+ dc->total_downtime += now - dc->last_begin;
> >Shall we do this accouting only if we are sure the copied page address
> >is one of the page faulted addresses? Can it be some other page? I
> >don't know. But since we have the loop below to make sure of it, why
> >not?
> no, the downtime implies since page fault till the
> page will be copied.
> Yes another pages could be copied as well as pagefaulted,
> and they are copied due to prefetching, but it's not a downtime.
Not sure I got the point... Do you mean that when reach here, then
this page address is definitely one of the faulted addresses? I am not
100% sure of this, but if you are sure, I am okay with it.
>
> >A nitpick on perf: when there are lots of vcpus, the algo might be
> >slow since we have several places that loops over the smp_vcpus. But
> >this can be totally future work on top, and current way is good enough
> >at least for me.
>
> >(for the nit: maybe add a hash, key=thread_id, value=cpu_index, then
> > get_mem_fault_cpu_index() can be faster using the hash; meanwhile
> > keep a counter A of page faulted vcpus, use atomic ops with it, then
> > here all_vcpu_down can be checked by A == smp_vcpus)
> just binary search in get_mem_fault_cpu_index will be nice too )
> also, it's good idea to keep all_vcpu_down in PostcopyDowntimeContext.
>
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >>+ }
> >>+
> >>+ /* lookup cpu, to clear it */
> >>+ for (i = 0; i < smp_cpus; i++) {
> >>+ uint64_t vcpu_downtime;
> >>+
> >>+ if (dc->vcpu_addr[i] != addr) {
> >>+ continue;
> >>+ }
> >>+
> >>+ vcpu_downtime = now - dc->page_fault_vcpu_time[i];
> >>+
> >>+ dc->vcpu_addr[i] = 0;
> >>+ dc->vcpu_downtime[i] += vcpu_downtime;
> >>+ }
> >>+
> >>+ trace_mark_postcopy_downtime_end(addr, dc, dc->total_downtime);
> >>+}
> >>+
> >>+/*
> >>+ * This function just provide calculated before downtime per cpu and trace
> >>it.
> >>+ * Total downtime is calculated in mark_postcopy_downtime_end.
> >>+ *
> >>+ *
> >>+ * Assume we have 3 CPU
> >>+ *
> >>+ * S1 E1 S1 E1
> >>+ * -----***********------------xxx***************------------------------>
> >>CPU1
> >>+ *
> >>+ * S2 E2
> >>+ * ------------****************xxx--------------------------------------->
> >>CPU2
> >>+ *
> >>+ * S3 E3
> >>+ * ------------------------****xxx********------------------------------->
> >>CPU3
> >>+ *
> >>+ * We have sequence S1,S2,E1,S3,S1,E2,E3,E1
> >>+ * S2,E1 - doesn't match condition due to sequence S1,S2,E1 doesn't
> >>include CPU3
> >>+ * S3,S1,E2 - sequence includes all CPUs, in this case overlap will be
> >>S1,E2 -
> >>+ * it's a part of total downtime.
> >>+ * S1 - here is last_begin
> >>+ * Legend of the picture is following:
> >>+ * * - means downtime per vCPU
> >>+ * x - means overlapped downtime (total downtime)
> >>+ */
> >>+uint64_t get_postcopy_total_downtime(void)
> >>+{
> >>+ MigrationIncomingState *mis = migration_incoming_get_current();
> >>+
> >>+ if (!mis->downtime_ctx) {
> >>+ return 0;
> >>+ }
> >>+
> >>+ if (trace_event_get_state(TRACE_DOWNTIME_PER_CPU)) {
> >>+ int i;
> >>+ for (i = 0; i < smp_cpus; i++) {
> >>+ trace_downtime_per_cpu(i, mis->downtime_ctx->vcpu_downtime[i]);
> >>+ }
> >>+ }
> >>+ return mis->downtime_ctx->total_downtime;
> >>+}
> >>diff --git a/migration/postcopy-ram.c b/migration/postcopy-ram.c
> >>index f3688f5..cf2b935 100644
> >>--- a/migration/postcopy-ram.c
> >>+++ b/migration/postcopy-ram.c
> >>@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> >> #include "migration/postcopy-ram.h"
> >> #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
> >> #include "sysemu/balloon.h"
> >>+#include <sys/param.h>
> >> #include "qemu/error-report.h"
> >> #include "trace.h"
> >>@@ -468,6 +469,19 @@ static int ram_block_enable_notify(const char
> >>*block_name, void *host_addr,
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >>+static int get_mem_fault_cpu_index(uint32_t pid)
> >>+{
> >>+ CPUState *cpu_iter;
> >>+
> >>+ CPU_FOREACH(cpu_iter) {
> >>+ if (cpu_iter->thread_id == pid) {
> >>+ return cpu_iter->cpu_index;
> >>+ }
> >>+ }
> >>+ trace_get_mem_fault_cpu_index(pid);
> >>+ return -1;
> >>+}
> >>+
> >> /*
> >> * Handle faults detected by the USERFAULT markings
> >> */
> >>@@ -545,8 +559,11 @@ static void *postcopy_ram_fault_thread(void *opaque)
> >> rb_offset &= ~(qemu_ram_pagesize(rb) - 1);
> >> trace_postcopy_ram_fault_thread_request(msg.arg.pagefault.address,
> >> qemu_ram_get_idstr(rb),
> >>- rb_offset);
> >>+ rb_offset,
> >>+
> >>msg.arg.pagefault.feat.ptid);
> >>+
> >>mark_postcopy_downtime_begin((uintptr_t)(msg.arg.pagefault.address),
> >>+
> >>get_mem_fault_cpu_index(msg.arg.pagefault.feat.ptid));
> >> /*
> >> * Send the request to the source - we want to request one
> >> * of our host page sizes (which is >= TPS)
> >>@@ -641,6 +658,7 @@ int postcopy_place_page(MigrationIncomingState *mis,
> >>void *host, void *from,
> >> return -e;
> >> }
> >>+ mark_postcopy_downtime_end((uint64_t)host);
> >> trace_postcopy_place_page(host);
> >> return 0;
> >>diff --git a/migration/trace-events b/migration/trace-events
> >>index b8f01a2..d338810 100644
> >>--- a/migration/trace-events
> >>+++ b/migration/trace-events
> >>@@ -110,6 +110,9 @@ process_incoming_migration_co_end(int ret, int ps)
> >>"ret=%d postcopy-state=%d"
> >> process_incoming_migration_co_postcopy_end_main(void) ""
> >> migration_set_incoming_channel(void *ioc, const char *ioctype) "ioc=%p
> >> ioctype=%s"
> >> migration_set_outgoing_channel(void *ioc, const char *ioctype, const char
> >> *hostname) "ioc=%p ioctype=%s hostname=%s"
> >>+mark_postcopy_downtime_begin(uint64_t addr, void *dd, int64_t time, int
> >>cpu) "addr 0x%" PRIx64 " dd %p time %" PRId64 " cpu %d"
> >>+mark_postcopy_downtime_end(uint64_t addr, void *dd, int64_t time) "addr
> >>0x%" PRIx64 " dd %p time %" PRId64
> >>+downtime_per_cpu(int cpu_index, int64_t downtime) "downtime cpu[%d]=%"
> >>PRId64
> >> # migration/rdma.c
> >> qemu_rdma_accept_incoming_migration(void) ""
> >>@@ -186,7 +189,7 @@ postcopy_ram_enable_notify(void) ""
> >> postcopy_ram_fault_thread_entry(void) ""
> >> postcopy_ram_fault_thread_exit(void) ""
> >> postcopy_ram_fault_thread_quit(void) ""
> >>-postcopy_ram_fault_thread_request(uint64_t hostaddr, const char *ramblock,
> >>size_t offset) "Request for HVA=%" PRIx64 " rb=%s offset=%zx"
> >>+postcopy_ram_fault_thread_request(uint64_t hostaddr, const char *ramblock,
> >>size_t offset, uint32_t pid) "Request for HVA=%" PRIx64 " rb=%s offset=%zx
> >>%u"
> >> postcopy_ram_incoming_cleanup_closeuf(void) ""
> >> postcopy_ram_incoming_cleanup_entry(void) ""
> >> postcopy_ram_incoming_cleanup_exit(void) ""
> >>@@ -195,6 +198,7 @@ save_xbzrle_page_skipping(void) ""
> >> save_xbzrle_page_overflow(void) ""
> >> ram_save_iterate_big_wait(uint64_t milliconds, int iterations) "big wait:
> >> %" PRIu64 " milliseconds, %d iterations"
> >> ram_load_complete(int ret, uint64_t seq_iter) "exit_code %d seq iteration
> >> %" PRIu64
> >>+get_mem_fault_cpu_index(uint32_t pid) "pid %u is not vCPU"
> >> # migration/exec.c
> >> migration_exec_outgoing(const char *cmd) "cmd=%s"
> >>--
> >>1.9.1
> >>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Alexey Perevalov
--
Peter Xu
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RESEND V3 5/6] migration: calculate downtime on dst side,
Peter Xu <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RESEND V3 5/6] migration: calculate downtime on dst side, Alexey, 2017/05/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RESEND V3 5/6] migration: calculate downtime on dst side, Peter Xu, 2017/05/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RESEND V3 5/6] migration: calculate downtime on dst side, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2017/05/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RESEND V3 5/6] migration: calculate downtime on dst side, Daniel P. Berrange, 2017/05/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RESEND V3 5/6] migration: calculate downtime on dst side, Alexey, 2017/05/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RESEND V3 5/6] migration: calculate downtime on dst side, Daniel P. Berrange, 2017/05/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RESEND V3 5/6] migration: calculate downtime on dst side, Peter Xu, 2017/05/11
- Message not available
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RESEND V3 5/6] migration: calculate downtime on dst side, Alexey, 2017/05/11
- Message not available
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RESEND V3 5/6] migration: calculate downtime on dst side, Alexey, 2017/05/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RESEND V3 5/6] migration: calculate downtime on dst side, Alexey, 2017/05/09