[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 6/9] virtio-crypto: rework virtio_crypto_handle_req
From: |
Gonglei |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 6/9] virtio-crypto: rework virtio_crypto_handle_request |
Date: |
Mon, 8 May 2017 19:38:21 +0800 |
According to the new spec, we should use different
requst structure to store the data request based
on whether VIRTIO_CRYPTO_F_MUX_MODE feature bit is
negotiated or not.
In this patch, we havn't supported stateless mode
yet. The device reportes an error if both
VIRTIO_CRYPTO_F_MUX_MODE and VIRTIO_CRYPTO_F_CIPHER_STATELESS_MODE
are negotiated, meanwhile the header.flag doesn't set
to VIRTIO_CRYPTO_FLAG_SESSION_MODE.
Let's handle this scenario in the following patches.
Signed-off-by: Gonglei <address@hidden>
---
hw/virtio/virtio-crypto.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-crypto.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-crypto.c
index 0353eb6..c4b8a2c 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/virtio-crypto.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-crypto.c
@@ -577,6 +577,7 @@ virtio_crypto_handle_request(VirtIOCryptoReq *request)
VirtQueueElement *elem = &request->elem;
int queue_index = virtio_crypto_vq2q(virtio_get_queue_index(request->vq));
struct virtio_crypto_op_data_req req;
+ struct virtio_crypto_op_data_req_mux req_mux;
int ret;
struct iovec *in_iov;
struct iovec *out_iov;
@@ -587,6 +588,9 @@ virtio_crypto_handle_request(VirtIOCryptoReq *request)
uint64_t session_id;
CryptoDevBackendSymOpInfo *sym_op_info = NULL;
Error *local_err = NULL;
+ bool mux_mode_is_negotiated;
+ struct virtio_crypto_op_header *header;
+ bool is_stateless_req = false;
if (elem->out_num < 1 || elem->in_num < 1) {
virtio_error(vdev, "virtio-crypto dataq missing headers");
@@ -597,12 +601,28 @@ virtio_crypto_handle_request(VirtIOCryptoReq *request)
out_iov = elem->out_sg;
in_num = elem->in_num;
in_iov = elem->in_sg;
- if (unlikely(iov_to_buf(out_iov, out_num, 0, &req, sizeof(req))
- != sizeof(req))) {
- virtio_error(vdev, "virtio-crypto request outhdr too short");
- return -1;
+
+ mux_mode_is_negotiated =
+ virtio_vdev_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_CRYPTO_F_MUX_MODE);
+ if (!mux_mode_is_negotiated) {
+ if (unlikely(iov_to_buf(out_iov, out_num, 0, &req, sizeof(req))
+ != sizeof(req))) {
+ virtio_error(vdev, "virtio-crypto request outhdr too short");
+ return -1;
+ }
+ iov_discard_front(&out_iov, &out_num, sizeof(req));
+
+ header = &req.header;
+ } else {
+ if (unlikely(iov_to_buf(out_iov, out_num, 0, &req_mux,
+ sizeof(req_mux)) != sizeof(req_mux))) {
+ virtio_error(vdev, "virtio-crypto request outhdr too short");
+ return -1;
+ }
+ iov_discard_front(&out_iov, &out_num, sizeof(req_mux));
+
+ header = &req_mux.header;
}
- iov_discard_front(&out_iov, &out_num, sizeof(req));
if (in_iov[in_num - 1].iov_len <
sizeof(struct virtio_crypto_inhdr)) {
@@ -623,16 +643,51 @@ virtio_crypto_handle_request(VirtIOCryptoReq *request)
request->in_num = in_num;
request->in_iov = in_iov;
- opcode = ldl_le_p(&req.header.opcode);
- session_id = ldq_le_p(&req.header.session_id);
+ opcode = ldl_le_p(&header->opcode);
switch (opcode) {
case VIRTIO_CRYPTO_CIPHER_ENCRYPT:
case VIRTIO_CRYPTO_CIPHER_DECRYPT:
- ret = virtio_crypto_handle_sym_req(vcrypto,
+ if (!mux_mode_is_negotiated) {
+ ret = virtio_crypto_handle_sym_req(vcrypto,
&req.u.sym_req,
&sym_op_info,
out_iov, out_num);
+ } else {
+ if (!virtio_vdev_has_feature(vdev,
+ VIRTIO_CRYPTO_F_CIPHER_STATELESS_MODE)) {
+ /*
+ * If the VIRTIO_CRYPTO_F_CIPHER_STATELESS_MODE is not
+ * negotiated, the driver MUST use the session mode
+ */
+ ret = virtio_crypto_handle_sym_req(vcrypto,
+ &req_mux.u.sym_req.data,
+ &sym_op_info,
+ out_iov, out_num);
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * If the VIRTIO_CRYPTO_F_CIPHER_STATELESS_MODE is
+ * negotiated, the device MUST parse header.flag
+ * in order to decide which mode the driver uses.
+ */
+ if (header->flag == VIRTIO_CRYPTO_FLAG_SESSION_MODE) {
+ ret = virtio_crypto_handle_sym_req(vcrypto,
+ &req_mux.u.sym_req.data,
+ &sym_op_info,
+ out_iov, out_num);
+ } else {
+ is_stateless_req = true;
+ /*
+ * Handle stateless mode, that is
+ * header->flag == VIRTIO_CRYPTO_FLAG_STATELESS_MODE
+ */
+ virtio_error(vdev,
+ "virtio-crypto do not support stateless mode");
+ return -1;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
/* Serious errors, need to reset virtio crypto device */
if (ret == -EFAULT) {
return -1;
@@ -640,11 +695,15 @@ virtio_crypto_handle_request(VirtIOCryptoReq *request)
virtio_crypto_req_complete(request, VIRTIO_CRYPTO_NOTSUPP);
virtio_crypto_free_request(request);
} else {
- sym_op_info->session_id = session_id;
+ if (!is_stateless_req) {
+ sym_op_info->op_code = opcode;
+ session_id = ldq_le_p(&header->session_id);
+ sym_op_info->session_id = session_id;
+ /* Set request's parameter */
+ request->flags = CRYPTODEV_BACKEND_ALG_SYM;
+ request->u.sym_op_info = sym_op_info;
+ }
- /* Set request's parameter */
- request->flags = CRYPTODEV_BACKEND_ALG_SYM;
- request->u.sym_op_info = sym_op_info;
ret = cryptodev_backend_crypto_operation(vcrypto->cryptodev,
request, queue_index, &local_err);
if (ret < 0) {
--
1.8.3.1
- [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 0/9] virtio-crypto: add stateless mode support, Gonglei, 2017/05/08
- [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 6/9] virtio-crypto: rework virtio_crypto_handle_request,
Gonglei <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 6/9] virtio-crypto: rework virtio_crypto_handle_request, Halil Pasic, 2017/05/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 6/9] virtio-crypto: rework virtio_crypto_handle_request, Gonglei (Arei), 2017/05/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 6/9] virtio-crypto: rework virtio_crypto_handle_request, Halil Pasic, 2017/05/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 6/9] virtio-crypto: rework virtio_crypto_handle_request, Gonglei (Arei), 2017/05/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 6/9] virtio-crypto: rework virtio_crypto_handle_request, Halil Pasic, 2017/05/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 6/9] virtio-crypto: rework virtio_crypto_handle_request, Gonglei (Arei), 2017/05/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 6/9] virtio-crypto: rework virtio_crypto_handle_request, Halil Pasic, 2017/05/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 6/9] virtio-crypto: rework virtio_crypto_handle_request, Gonglei (Arei), 2017/05/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 6/9] virtio-crypto: rework virtio_crypto_handle_request, Halil Pasic, 2017/05/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 6/9] virtio-crypto: rework virtio_crypto_handle_request, Cornelia Huck, 2017/05/17