qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: Simplify BDRV_BLOCK_RAW recursion


From: Fam Zheng
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: Simplify BDRV_BLOCK_RAW recursion
Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 16:14:09 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23)

On Thu, 05/04 12:37, Eric Blake wrote:
> Since we are already in coroutine context during the body of
> bdrv_co_get_block_status(), we can shave off a few layers of
> wrappers when recursing to query the protocol when a format driver
> returned BDRV_BLOCK_RAW.
> 
> Note that we are already using the correct recursion later on in
> the same function, when probing whether the protocol layer is sparse
> in order to find out if we can add BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO to an existing
> BDRV_BLOCK_DATA|BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>
> ---
>  block/io.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
> index 40bd94f..fdd7485 100644
> --- a/block/io.c
> +++ b/block/io.c
> @@ -1784,8 +1784,8 @@ static int64_t coroutine_fn 
> bdrv_co_get_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
> 
>      if (ret & BDRV_BLOCK_RAW) {
>          assert(ret & BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID);
> -        ret = bdrv_get_block_status(*file, ret >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS,
> -                                    *pnum, pnum, file);
> +        ret = bdrv_co_get_block_status(*file, ret >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS,
> +                                       *pnum, pnum, file);
>          goto out;
>      }
> 
> -- 
> 2.9.3
> 
> 

Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <address@hidden>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]