qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qemu-img: Check for backing image if specifi


From: John Snow
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qemu-img: Check for backing image if specified during create
Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 14:21:12 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.0


On 05/09/2017 02:19 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/09/2017 01:17 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 05/09/2017 01:09 PM, John Snow wrote:
>>> Or, rather, force the open of a backing image if one was specified
>>> for creation. Using a similar -unsafe option as rebase, allow qemu-img
>>> to ignore the backing file validation if possible.
>>>
> 
>>> +++ b/qemu-img.c
>>> @@ -145,9 +145,11 @@ static void QEMU_NORETURN help(void)
>>>             "  'snapshot_id_or_name' is deprecated, use 'snapshot_param'\n"
>>>             "    instead\n"
>>>             "  '-c' indicates that target image must be compressed (qcow 
>>> format only)\n"
>>> -           "  '-u' enables unsafe rebasing. It is assumed that old and new 
>>> backing file\n"
>>> -           "       match exactly. The image doesn't need a working backing 
>>> file before\n"
>>> -           "       rebasing in this case (useful for renaming the backing 
>>> file)\n"
>>> +           "  '-u' allows unsafe backing chains. For rebasing, it is 
>>> assumed that old and new\n"
>>> +           "       backing file match exactly. The image doesn't need a 
>>> working backing file\n"
>>> +           "       before rebasing in this case (useful for renaming the 
>>> backing file)\n"
> 
> Also, a '.' to end this sentence would be nice.
> 

d'oh.

I can respin if that's more convenient, as I am assuming Max or Kevin
will have something to say.

If not, either edit it if that's easier, or ask me to re-spin.

>>> +           "       For image creation, allow creating without attempting 
>>> to"
>>
>> Missing \n
>>
>> With that fixed,
>> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>
>>
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]