|
From: | Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] nbd: strict nbd_wr_syncv |
Date: | Tue, 16 May 2017 13:16:51 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 |
16.05.2017 12:51, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 16/05/2017 11:32, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:16.05.2017 12:10, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:15.05.2017 12:43, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:I mean, make negotiation behave like normal nbd communication, non-blocking socket + yield.. So, some other coroutines may do their work, while nbd-negotiation coroutine waits for io..Some callers of bdrv_open may not allow reentrancy. For example: handle_qmp_command -> qmp_dispatch -> do_qmp_dispatch -> qmp_marshal_blockdev_add -> qmp_blockdev_add -> bds_tree_init -> bdrv_open You cannot return to the monitor before qmp_blockdev_add is done, otherwise you don't have a return value for handle_qmp_command to pass to monitor_json_emitter.
Hmm. What about something like bdrv_pread (finally, bdrv_prwv_co) for non-coroutine, ie, calling aio_poll in a while loop, until coroutine finishes?
Also, one more question here: in nbd_negotiate_write(), why do we need qio_channel_add_watch? write_sync will yield with qio_channel_yield() until io complete, why to use 2 mechanisms to wake up a coroutine?Hmm, these nbd_negotiate_* functions was introduced in 1a6245a5b, when nbd_wr_syncv was working through qemu_co_sendv_recvv, which just yields, without setting any handlers. But now, nbd_wr_syncv works through qio_channel_yield() which sets handlers, so the code with extra watchers looks wrong.Yes, I think you're right about that.
Ok, I'll make a patch for it and finish LOG->errp conversion.
Paolo
-- Best regards, Vladimir
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |