qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] target/ppc: consolidate CPU device-tree


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] target/ppc: consolidate CPU device-tree id computation in helper
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 12:04:13 +1000
User-agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23)

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:32:20PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> For historical reasons, we compute CPU device-tree ids with a non-trivial
> logic. This patch consolidate the logic in a single helper to be used
> in various places where it is currently open-coded.
> 
> It is okay to get rid of DIV_ROUND_UP() because we're sure that the number
> of threads per core in the guest cannot exceed the number of threads per
> core in the host.

However, your new logic still gives different answers in some cases.
In particular when max_cpus is not a multiple of smp_threads.  Which
is generally a bad idea, but allowed for older machine types for
compatibility.   e.g. smp_threads=4, max_cpus=6 smt=8

Old logic:
                 DIV_ROUND_UP(6 * 8, 4)
               = ⌈48 / 4⌉ = 12

New logic gives: ⌊6 / 4⌋ * 8 + (6 % 4)
               = 1 * 8 + 2
               = 10

In any case the DIV_ROUND_UP() isn't to handle the case where guest
threads-per-core is bigger than host threads-per-core, it's (IIRC) for
the case where guest threads-per-core is not a factor of host
threads-per-core.  Again, a bad idea, but I think allowed in some old
cases.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/ppc/spapr.c              |    6 ++----
>  target/ppc/cpu.h            |   17 +++++++++++++++++
>  target/ppc/translate_init.c |    3 +--
>  3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> index 75e298b4c6be..1bb05a9a6b07 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> @@ -981,7 +981,6 @@ static void *spapr_build_fdt(sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
>      void *fdt;
>      sPAPRPHBState *phb;
>      char *buf;
> -    int smt = kvmppc_smt_threads();
>  
>      fdt = g_malloc0(FDT_MAX_SIZE);
>      _FDT((fdt_create_empty_tree(fdt, FDT_MAX_SIZE)));
> @@ -1021,7 +1020,7 @@ static void *spapr_build_fdt(sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
>      _FDT(fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, 0, "#size-cells", 2));
>  
>      /* /interrupt controller */
> -    spapr_dt_xics(DIV_ROUND_UP(max_cpus * smt, smp_threads), fdt, 
> PHANDLE_XICP);
> +    spapr_dt_xics(ppc_cpu_dt_id_from_index(max_cpus), fdt, PHANDLE_XICP);
>  
>      ret = spapr_populate_memory(spapr, fdt);
>      if (ret < 0) {
> @@ -1977,7 +1976,6 @@ static void spapr_init_cpus(sPAPRMachineState *spapr)
>      MachineState *machine = MACHINE(spapr);
>      MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine);
>      char *type = spapr_get_cpu_core_type(machine->cpu_model);
> -    int smt = kvmppc_smt_threads();
>      const CPUArchIdList *possible_cpus;
>      int boot_cores_nr = smp_cpus / smp_threads;
>      int i;
> @@ -2014,7 +2012,7 @@ static void spapr_init_cpus(sPAPRMachineState *spapr)
>              sPAPRDRConnector *drc =
>                  spapr_dr_connector_new(OBJECT(spapr),
>                                         SPAPR_DR_CONNECTOR_TYPE_CPU,
> -                                       (core_id / smp_threads) * smt);
> +                                       ppc_cpu_dt_id_from_index(core_id));
>  
>              qemu_register_reset(spapr_drc_reset, drc);
>          }
> diff --git a/target/ppc/cpu.h b/target/ppc/cpu.h
> index 401e10e7dad8..47fe6c64698f 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/ppc/cpu.h
> @@ -2529,4 +2529,21 @@ int ppc_get_vcpu_dt_id(PowerPCCPU *cpu);
>  PowerPCCPU *ppc_get_vcpu_by_dt_id(int cpu_dt_id);
>  
>  void ppc_maybe_bswap_register(CPUPPCState *env, uint8_t *mem_buf, int len);
> +
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> +#include "sysemu/cpus.h"
> +#include "target/ppc/kvm_ppc.h"
> +
> +static inline int ppc_cpu_dt_id_from_index(int cpu_index)
> +{
> +    /* POWER HV support has an historical limitation that different threads
> +     * on a single core cannot be in different guests at the same time. In
> +     * order to allow KVM to assign guest threads to host cores accordingly,
> +     * CPU device tree ids are spaced by the number of threads per host 
> cores.
> +     */
> +    return (cpu_index / smp_threads) * kvmppc_smt_threads()
> +        + (cpu_index % smp_threads);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  #endif /* PPC_CPU_H */
> diff --git a/target/ppc/translate_init.c b/target/ppc/translate_init.c
> index 56a0ab22cfbe..837a9a496a65 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/translate_init.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/translate_init.c
> @@ -9851,8 +9851,7 @@ static void ppc_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error 
> **errp)
>      }
>  
>  #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> -    cpu->cpu_dt_id = (cs->cpu_index / smp_threads) * max_smt
> -        + (cs->cpu_index % smp_threads);
> +    cpu->cpu_dt_id = ppc_cpu_dt_id_from_index(cs->cpu_index);
>  
>      if (kvm_enabled() && !kvm_vcpu_id_is_valid(cpu->cpu_dt_id)) {
>          error_setg(errp, "Can't create CPU with id %d in KVM", 
> cpu->cpu_dt_id);
> 

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]