qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] memory consumption of Qemu is twice as much as th


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] memory consumption of Qemu is twice as much as the previous version in KVM
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 10:27:59 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0


On 22/05/2017 09:04, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
> 
> I found that the latest Qemu eat 2 time memory in KVM since Qemu-2.3.0.
> 
> Replication Steps:
> 
> 1. I created a CentOS 7 with 4U8G using Qemu-2.3.0, 
> 
> # grep kvm_kvzalloc /proc/vmallocinfo | awk '{total+=$2}; END {print total}'
> 16932864
> # grep kvm_kvzalloc /proc/vmallocinfo
> 0xffffc900205c7000-0xffffc90020fc8000 10489856 kvm_kvzalloc+0x3c/0x40 [kvm] 
> pages=2560 vmalloc vpages N1=2560
> 0xffffc90020fc8000-0xffffc90020fce000   24576 kvm_kvzalloc+0x3c/0x40 [kvm] 
> pages=5 vmalloc N1=5
> 0xffffc90020fce000-0xffffc90020fd4000   24576 kvm_kvzalloc+0x3c/0x40 [kvm] 
> pages=5 vmalloc N1=5
> 0xffffc90020fd4000-0xffffc90020fd8000   16384 kvm_kvzalloc+0x3c/0x40 [kvm] 
> pages=3 vmalloc N1=3
> 0xffffc9002438b000-0xffffc9002498c000 6295552 kvm_kvzalloc+0x3c/0x40 [kvm] 
> pages=1536 vmalloc vpages N1=1536
> 0xffffc9002498c000-0xffffc90024990000   16384 kvm_kvzalloc+0x3c/0x40 [kvm] 
> pages=3 vmalloc N1=3
> 0xffffc90024990000-0xffffc90024994000   16384 kvm_kvzalloc+0x3c/0x40 [kvm] 
> pages=3 vmalloc N1=3
> 0xffffc90024994000-0xffffc90024997000   12288 kvm_kvzalloc+0x3c/0x40 [kvm] 
> pages=2 vmalloc N1=2
> 0xffffc90024a75000-0xffffc90024a7e000   36864 kvm_kvzalloc+0x3c/0x40 [kvm] 
> pages=8 vmalloc N1=8
> 
> PS: There is only this VM in my host.
> 
> 2. Do the same test using the latest Qemu:
> 
> # grep kvm_kvzalloc /proc/vmallocinfo | awk '{total+=$2}; END {print total}'
> 33865728
> linux-PsHdkO:~ # grep kvm_kvzalloc /proc/vmallocinfo 
> 0xffffc9001f181000-0xffffc9001fb82000 10489856 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm] 
> pages=2560 vmalloc vpages N1=2560
> 0xffffc9001fb82000-0xffffc9001fb88000   24576 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm] 
> pages=5 vmalloc N1=5
> 0xffffc9001fb88000-0xffffc9001fb8e000   24576 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm] 
> pages=5 vmalloc N1=5
> 0xffffc9001fb8e000-0xffffc9001fb92000   16384 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm] 
> pages=3 vmalloc N1=3
> 0xffffc90020854000-0xffffc90021255000 10489856 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm] 
> pages=2560 vmalloc vpages N1=2560
> 0xffffc90021255000-0xffffc9002125b000   24576 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm] 
> pages=5 vmalloc N1=5
> 0xffffc9002125b000-0xffffc90021261000   24576 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm] 
> pages=5 vmalloc N1=5
> 0xffffc90021261000-0xffffc90021265000   16384 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm] 
> pages=3 vmalloc N1=3
> 0xffffc9002616e000-0xffffc90026172000   16384 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm] 
> pages=3 vmalloc N1=3
> 0xffffc90026172000-0xffffc90026176000   16384 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm] 
> pages=3 vmalloc N1=3
> 0xffffc90026176000-0xffffc90026179000   12288 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm] 
> pages=2 vmalloc N1=2
> 0xffffc900261a9000-0xffffc900261ad000   16384 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm] 
> pages=3 vmalloc N1=3
> 0xffffc900261ad000-0xffffc900261b1000   16384 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm] 
> pages=3 vmalloc N1=3
> 0xffffc900261b1000-0xffffc900261b4000   12288 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm] 
> pages=2 vmalloc N1=2
> 0xffffc900280fe000-0xffffc900286ff000 6295552 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm] 
> pages=1536 vmalloc vpages N1=1536
> 0xffffc900286ff000-0xffffc90028d00000 6295552 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm] 
> pages=1536 vmalloc vpages N1=1536
> 0xffffc90028d87000-0xffffc90028d90000   36864 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm] 
> pages=8 vmalloc N1=8
> 0xffffc90028d9c000-0xffffc90028da5000   36864 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm] 
> pages=8 vmalloc N1=8
> 
> 
> 3. I found the first bad commit by 'git biscet'
> 
> linux-arei:/mnt/sdb/gonglei/opensource/qemu # git bisect bad
> 6410848bec38089424d54a6a8f10d4cf77182b5d is the first bad commit
> commit 6410848bec38089424d54a6a8f10d4cf77182b5d
> Author: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> Date:   Thu Jun 18 18:30:16 2015 +0200
> 
>     target-i386: register a separate KVM address space including SMRAM regions
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> 
> :040000 040000 b2435d7cd0829e6416b316f1ae2856e6f7b0023d 
> 1acb81aecaf50f2d313b33f2b61a24f7f0bd6f07 M      target-i386
> linux-PsHdkO:/mnt/sdb/gonglei/opensource/qemu #
> 
> 
> Any ideas about this change? Do we really need to trigger two times memory 
> region allocation?

We are registering two memory maps, so yes as long as "-machine smm=on"
is set.  We can skip the second address space if SMM is disabled.

Paolo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]